Skip to main content
Economics

Return to Question

added 334 characters in body
Source Link
123
123
  • 2.9k
  • 2
  • 14
  • 32

I need to know how to find robust S.E. for the CF approach to endogeneity.

Consider the model: $$y_i=X_i\beta_1 + W_i\beta_2+\epsilon_i$$

Assume: $$E[X_i\epsilon_i]=0$$ $$E[W_i\epsilon_i] \neq 0$$

Thus, $W_i$ is endogenous.

Now, let: $$E[Z_iW_i] \neq 0$$ $$E[Z_i\epsilon_i]=0$$

The control function approach:

  • $W_i = \gamma_1 X_i + \gamma_2 Z_i + \phi_i $

  • $\epsilon_i = \alpha \phi_i + \chi$

now we replace $\epsilon_i$ in our original equation:

$$y_i=X_i\beta_1 + W_i\beta_2+ \phi_i \alpha + \chi$$

Sowhere now we have:

$$E[W_i\epsilon_i]=0$$ $E[W_i \chi]=0$

Intuition: I think I used the series of linear projections to 'control' for the endogenous portion of $W_i$.

EDIT: I originally typed this incorrectly. I have changed the relevant orthogonality condition. Here is the intuition behind the (correct) orthogonality condition $E[W_i \chi]=0$:

Since $W_i$ is a linear function of $X_i , Z_i$, and both are themselves orthogonal to $\chi$, we obtain the given orthogonality condition.

Okay - the question. I think that $\hat \beta_{2.CF} \equiv \hat \beta_{2.OLS} \equiv \frac{cov(W_i,Y_i)}{Var(W_i)}$

If this is correct, do I just use the R.S.E. form that I use in OLS if I want heteroskedasticity robust S.E. when using the C.F. approach?

I need to know how to find robust S.E. for the CF approach to endogeneity.

Consider the model: $$y_i=X_i\beta_1 + W_i\beta_2+\epsilon_i$$

Assume: $$E[X_i\epsilon_i]=0$$ $$E[W_i\epsilon_i] \neq 0$$

Thus, $W_i$ is endogenous.

Now, let: $$E[Z_iW_i] \neq 0$$ $$E[Z_i\epsilon_i]=0$$

The control function approach:

  • $W_i = \gamma_1 X_i + \gamma_2 Z_i + \phi_i $

  • $\epsilon_i = \alpha \phi_i + \chi$

now we replace $\epsilon_i$ in our original equation:

$$y_i=X_i\beta_1 + W_i\beta_2+ \phi_i \alpha + \chi$$

So now we have:

$$E[W_i\epsilon_i]=0$$

Intuition: I think I used the series of linear projections to 'control' for the endogenous portion of $W_i$.

Okay - the question. I think that $\hat \beta_{2.CF} \equiv \hat \beta_{2.OLS} \equiv \frac{cov(W_i,Y_i)}{Var(W_i)}$

If this is correct, do I just use the R.S.E. form that I use in OLS if I want heteroskedasticity robust S.E. when using the C.F. approach?

I need to know how to find robust S.E. for the CF approach to endogeneity.

Consider the model: $$y_i=X_i\beta_1 + W_i\beta_2+\epsilon_i$$

Assume: $$E[X_i\epsilon_i]=0$$ $$E[W_i\epsilon_i] \neq 0$$

Thus, $W_i$ is endogenous.

Now, let: $$E[Z_iW_i] \neq 0$$ $$E[Z_i\epsilon_i]=0$$

The control function approach:

  • $W_i = \gamma_1 X_i + \gamma_2 Z_i + \phi_i $

  • $\epsilon_i = \alpha \phi_i + \chi$

now we replace $\epsilon_i$ in our original equation:

$$y_i=X_i\beta_1 + W_i\beta_2+ \phi_i \alpha + \chi$$

where now we have $E[W_i \chi]=0$

Intuition: I think I used the series of linear projections to 'control' for the endogenous portion of $W_i$.

EDIT: I originally typed this incorrectly. I have changed the relevant orthogonality condition. Here is the intuition behind the (correct) orthogonality condition $E[W_i \chi]=0$:

Since $W_i$ is a linear function of $X_i , Z_i$, and both are themselves orthogonal to $\chi$, we obtain the given orthogonality condition.

Okay - the question. I think that $\hat \beta_{2.CF} \equiv \hat \beta_{2.OLS} \equiv \frac{cov(W_i,Y_i)}{Var(W_i)}$

If this is correct, do I just use the R.S.E. form that I use in OLS if I want heteroskedasticity robust S.E. when using the C.F. approach?

deleted 126 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
123
123
  • 2.9k
  • 2
  • 14
  • 32

Robust Standard Errors for Control Function Approach??

I am preparing for qualifying exams and ran across an old question asking meneed to showknow how I can obtainto find robust standard errors when using a control functionS.E. for the CF approach to deal with an endogenous variableendogeneity.

Consider the model: $$y_i=X_i\beta_1 + W_i\beta_2+\epsilon_i$$

Assume: $$E[X_i\epsilon_i]=0$$ $$E[W_i\epsilon_i] \neq 0$$

Thus, $W_i$ is endogenous.

Now, let: $$E[Z_iW_i] \neq 0$$ $$E[Z_i\epsilon_i]=0$$

The control function approach:

  • $W_i = \gamma_1 X_i + \gamma_2 Z_i + \phi_i $

  • $\epsilon_i = \alpha \phi_i + \chi$

now we replace $\epsilon_i$ in our original equation:

$$y_i=X_i\beta_1 + W_i\beta_2+ \phi_i \alpha + \chi$$

So now we have:

$$E[W_i\epsilon_i]=0$$

Intuition: I think I used the series of linear projections to 'control' for the endogenous portion of $W_i$.

Okay - the question. I think that $\hat \beta_{2.CF} \equiv \hat \beta_{2.OLS} \equiv \frac{cov(W_i,Y_i)}{Var(W_i)}$

If this is correct, do I just use the R.S.E. form that I use in OLS if I want heteroskedasticity robust S.E. when using the C.F. approach?

Robust Standard Errors for Control Function Approach??

I am preparing for qualifying exams and ran across an old question asking me to show how I can obtain robust standard errors when using a control function approach to deal with an endogenous variable.

Consider the model: $$y_i=X_i\beta_1 + W_i\beta_2+\epsilon_i$$

Assume: $$E[X_i\epsilon_i]=0$$ $$E[W_i\epsilon_i] \neq 0$$

Thus, $W_i$ is endogenous.

Now, let: $$E[Z_iW_i] \neq 0$$ $$E[Z_i\epsilon_i]=0$$

The control function approach:

  • $W_i = \gamma_1 X_i + \gamma_2 Z_i + \phi_i $

  • $\epsilon_i = \alpha \phi_i + \chi$

now we replace $\epsilon_i$ in our original equation:

$$y_i=X_i\beta_1 + W_i\beta_2+ \phi_i \alpha + \chi$$

So now we have:

$$E[W_i\epsilon_i]=0$$

Intuition: I think I used the series of linear projections to 'control' for the endogenous portion of $W_i$.

Okay - the question. I think that $\hat \beta_{2.CF} \equiv \hat \beta_{2.OLS} \equiv \frac{cov(W_i,Y_i)}{Var(W_i)}$

If this is correct, do I just use the R.S.E. form that I use in OLS if I want heteroskedasticity robust S.E. when using the C.F. approach?

Robust Standard Errors for Control Function Approach?

I need to know how to find robust S.E. for the CF approach to endogeneity.

Consider the model: $$y_i=X_i\beta_1 + W_i\beta_2+\epsilon_i$$

Assume: $$E[X_i\epsilon_i]=0$$ $$E[W_i\epsilon_i] \neq 0$$

Thus, $W_i$ is endogenous.

Now, let: $$E[Z_iW_i] \neq 0$$ $$E[Z_i\epsilon_i]=0$$

The control function approach:

  • $W_i = \gamma_1 X_i + \gamma_2 Z_i + \phi_i $

  • $\epsilon_i = \alpha \phi_i + \chi$

now we replace $\epsilon_i$ in our original equation:

$$y_i=X_i\beta_1 + W_i\beta_2+ \phi_i \alpha + \chi$$

So now we have:

$$E[W_i\epsilon_i]=0$$

Intuition: I think I used the series of linear projections to 'control' for the endogenous portion of $W_i$.

Okay - the question. I think that $\hat \beta_{2.CF} \equiv \hat \beta_{2.OLS} \equiv \frac{cov(W_i,Y_i)}{Var(W_i)}$

If this is correct, do I just use the R.S.E. form that I use in OLS if I want heteroskedasticity robust S.E. when using the C.F. approach?

Source Link
123
123
  • 2.9k
  • 2
  • 14
  • 32

Robust Standard Errors for Control Function Approach??

I am preparing for qualifying exams and ran across an old question asking me to show how I can obtain robust standard errors when using a control function approach to deal with an endogenous variable.

Consider the model: $$y_i=X_i\beta_1 + W_i\beta_2+\epsilon_i$$

Assume: $$E[X_i\epsilon_i]=0$$ $$E[W_i\epsilon_i] \neq 0$$

Thus, $W_i$ is endogenous.

Now, let: $$E[Z_iW_i] \neq 0$$ $$E[Z_i\epsilon_i]=0$$

The control function approach:

  • $W_i = \gamma_1 X_i + \gamma_2 Z_i + \phi_i $

  • $\epsilon_i = \alpha \phi_i + \chi$

now we replace $\epsilon_i$ in our original equation:

$$y_i=X_i\beta_1 + W_i\beta_2+ \phi_i \alpha + \chi$$

So now we have:

$$E[W_i\epsilon_i]=0$$

Intuition: I think I used the series of linear projections to 'control' for the endogenous portion of $W_i$.

Okay - the question. I think that $\hat \beta_{2.CF} \equiv \hat \beta_{2.OLS} \equiv \frac{cov(W_i,Y_i)}{Var(W_i)}$

If this is correct, do I just use the R.S.E. form that I use in OLS if I want heteroskedasticity robust S.E. when using the C.F. approach?