Timeline for Why do currencies cover orders of magnitude?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2016 at 1:32 | answer | added | Aurigae | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 29, 2016 at 20:57 | answer | added | paj28 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 28, 2016 at 20:56 | history | migrated | from money.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Jun 28, 2016 at 20:25 | comment | added | JTP - Apologise to Monica | @quid - yes, when talking orders of magnitude, .75 is near 1. In grad school, there was a problem concerning compound interest over 360 years. I offered an estimate 35% off the actual result, but, given the years involved, I was only off by a few years out of 360. Whether the question is good here, is another story. | |
| Jun 28, 2016 at 20:14 | answer | added | Mark Monforti | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 28, 2016 at 20:02 | answer | added | Ben Miller | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jun 28, 2016 at 19:52 | answer | added | quid | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 28, 2016 at 19:50 | comment | added | quid | I don't think 0.75 can be honestly described as "almost exactly" 1... | |
| Jun 28, 2016 at 19:40 | history | asked | user01101001 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |