Timeline for Why is sovereign rate a reference?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2020 at 17:57 | comment | added | Brian Romanchuk | If there were two risk-free curves, what makes them distinct (other than the fact that r* is an alleged equilibrium rate, and the observed curve is the result of market trading)? | |
| Jul 13, 2020 at 14:20 | comment | added | BAL | So sovereign rate tend to align with r* only because both are risk-free rates ? | |
| Jul 13, 2020 at 13:35 | history | edited | Brian Romanchuk | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Jul 13, 2020 at 13:35 | comment | added | Brian Romanchuk | Somewhat archaic is a vague formulation. I’ll switch to “dated”. | |
| Jul 13, 2020 at 13:11 | comment | added | 1muflon1♦ | +1 but natural rate is far from an archaic term as is still widely used in papers especially in theory papers. Even in empirical papers it’s still quite widely used see for example the highly cited paper below from 2017 - I think saying that’s archaic is bit hyperbolic. scholar.google.com/… | |
| Jul 13, 2020 at 13:05 | history | answered | Brian Romanchuk | CC BY-SA 4.0 |