Timeline for Is the fundamental analysis also a self-fulfilling prophecy?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2021 at 5:38 | comment | added | Akshay Prabhakant | @1muflon1 why is there no category for fundamental and technical analysis? At least fundamental analysis isn't purely limited to equity, and hence IMHO it should have a category. Cheers!!. | |
| Mar 15, 2021 at 21:04 | comment | added | jmbejara | @1muflon1 The benefit of using Woodford's book is that either the question will be about a mathematically precise economic/econometric model or the text of the book will be, itself, referencing a peer-reviewed article. Makes it easy to transform a Q from his book into one that meets the criteria. (E.g., can provide a citation to the underlying peer-reviewed article referenced in the textbook.) | |
| Mar 15, 2021 at 20:45 | comment | added | 1muflon1♦ | @jmbejara ok I wont fight you on this in this case but I think textbooks/handbooks should generally count as academic literature. I don't know enough about this author, and the question is entry level, but I think it would be mistake to apply the label to lets say Q based on Woodford Insterest and Prices. I definitely do not want to discourage use of the tag but also lets not be too overzealous either. | |
| Mar 15, 2021 at 20:36 | comment | added | jmbejara | @1muflon1 I've marked this as "nonexpert" since books are generally not peer-reviewed. I don't think this meets the standard in any other criteria. | |
| Mar 15, 2021 at 20:34 | history | edited | jmbejara |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 15, 2021 at 12:11 | comment | added | Criticizing Israel not allowed | @Alex what if the market is only efficient because of people doing technical analysis? Market efficiency is an outcome, not an axiom. | |
| Mar 14, 2021 at 19:06 | answer | added | Grada Gukovic | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 14, 2021 at 17:34 | answer | added | Daniel | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 14, 2021 at 16:49 | comment | added | Alex | Market efficiency suggests that either methodology isn't particularly useful and there seems to be consensus (among academics) that the US stock market is pretty informationally efficient. | |
| S Mar 14, 2021 at 16:42 | history | edited | 1muflon1♦ |
This has nothing to do with real-analysis. (I dont think nonexpert applies here because the question refers to technical literature even if it is entry level)
|
|
| S Mar 14, 2021 at 16:42 | history | suggested | Alalalalaki |
This has nothing to do with real-analysis. This question is nonexpert.
|
|
| Mar 14, 2021 at 15:56 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 14, 2021 at 16:42 | |||||
| Mar 14, 2021 at 14:53 | history | asked | Akshay Prabhakant | CC BY-SA 4.0 |