Skip to main content
added 219 characters in body
Source Link
LBogaardt
  • 281
  • 1
  • 4

I disagree with @bbecon. I disagreeagree with @bbecon that concave utility functions present nice mathematical properties which help theorists develop analytical models. The

If the OP's question was why utility functions are concave, the fundamental argument is that utility experiences diminishing returns.

Examine the image below, taken form here.

enter image description here

Let's say good X is coffee and good Y is cake. If you have 1 cup of coffee, getting a 2nd may increase your utility, but not by as much as the first one. Idem for 2 slices of cake. But if you could get 1 cup of coffee and 1 slice of cake, you would be most happy.

This argument fails under some special circumstances (e.g. this), but I think it's reasonable in most cases.

I disagree with @bbecon. The fundamental argument is that utility experiences diminishing returns.

Examine the image below, taken form here.

enter image description here

Let's say good X is coffee and good Y is cake. If you have 1 cup of coffee, getting a 2nd may increase your utility, but not by as much as the first one. Idem for 2 slices of cake. But if you could get 1 cup of coffee and 1 slice of cake, you would be most happy.

This argument fails under some special circumstances (e.g. this), but I think it's reasonable in most cases.

I disagree with @bbecon. I agree with @bbecon that concave utility functions present nice mathematical properties which help theorists develop analytical models.

If the OP's question was why utility functions are concave, the fundamental argument is that utility experiences diminishing returns.

Examine the image below, taken form here.

enter image description here

Let's say good X is coffee and good Y is cake. If you have 1 cup of coffee, getting a 2nd may increase your utility, but not by as much as the first one. Idem for 2 slices of cake. But if you could get 1 cup of coffee and 1 slice of cake, you would be most happy.

This argument fails under some special circumstances (e.g. this), but I think it's reasonable in most cases.

added 1 character in body
Source Link
LBogaardt
  • 281
  • 1
  • 4

I disagree with @bbecon. The fundamental argument is that utility experiences diminishing returns.

Examine the image below, taken form here.

enter image description here

Let's say good X is coffee and good Y is cake. If you have 2 cups1 cup of coffee, getting a 3rd2nd may increase your utility, but not by as much as the first 2one. Idem for 2 slices onof cake. But if you could get 1 cup of coffee and 1 slice of cake, you would be most happy.

This argument fails under some special circumstances (e.g. this), but I think it's reasonable in most cases.

I disagree with @bbecon. The fundamental argument is that utility experiences diminishing returns.

Examine the image below, taken form here.

enter image description here

Let's say good X is coffee and good Y is cake. If you have 2 cups of coffee, getting a 3rd may increase your utility, but not by as much as the first 2. Idem for 2 slices on cake. But if you could get 1 cup of coffee and 1 slice of cake, you would be most happy.

This argument fails under some special circumstances (e.g. this), but I think it's reasonable in most cases.

I disagree with @bbecon. The fundamental argument is that utility experiences diminishing returns.

Examine the image below, taken form here.

enter image description here

Let's say good X is coffee and good Y is cake. If you have 1 cup of coffee, getting a 2nd may increase your utility, but not by as much as the first one. Idem for 2 slices of cake. But if you could get 1 cup of coffee and 1 slice of cake, you would be most happy.

This argument fails under some special circumstances (e.g. this), but I think it's reasonable in most cases.

Source Link
LBogaardt
  • 281
  • 1
  • 4

I disagree with @bbecon. The fundamental argument is that utility experiences diminishing returns.

Examine the image below, taken form here.

enter image description here

Let's say good X is coffee and good Y is cake. If you have 2 cups of coffee, getting a 3rd may increase your utility, but not by as much as the first 2. Idem for 2 slices on cake. But if you could get 1 cup of coffee and 1 slice of cake, you would be most happy.

This argument fails under some special circumstances (e.g. this), but I think it's reasonable in most cases.