Timeline for How to interpret Whited Wu index (WW-index)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2015 at 8:52 | comment | added | Kirill Lykov | onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecin.12080/epdf, Table 3 | |
| S Apr 10, 2015 at 13:24 | history | suggested | Kirill Lykov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
three dots looks weird in this forum
|
| Apr 10, 2015 at 9:50 | review | Late answers | |||
| Apr 10, 2015 at 16:24 | |||||
| Apr 10, 2015 at 9:50 | comment | added | AlexWeiß | Unfortunately it is not written in the WW paper. It is just how I did it during my research, without receiving negative values. However, there is still a possibility to receive negative values even with this approach, it just much minor. Excuse me but do you maybe remember the authors of the paper with the negative WW-indexes? The WW-Indexes in the WW paper are all positive and close to one. | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 9:39 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 10, 2015 at 13:24 | |||||
| Apr 10, 2015 at 9:39 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 10, 2015 at 10:59 | |||||
| Apr 10, 2015 at 9:38 | comment | added | Kirill Lykov | It is not relevant for me anymore, but for other people might be useful. Since I saw at least 2 papers with strictly negative WW-index numbers. Is this percentage story written in the WW paper somewhere? | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 | history | answered | AlexWeiß | CC BY-SA 3.0 |