Timeline for Why does not Uncovered Interest Parity hold exactly? Or does it?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2023 at 4:40 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Apr 9, 2023 at 23:48 | vote | accept | TeX_novice | ||
| Apr 9, 2023 at 23:46 | answer | added | AKdemy | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 9, 2023 at 23:45 | comment | added | TeX_novice | Sorry about any confusion, but I used the following, non-linearized condition: $(1+i_t)=(1+i^∗_t)S_{t+1}/S_t$ | |
| Apr 9, 2023 at 22:06 | comment | added | Giskard | P.s.: Your MathJax is nice, keep it up! | |
| Apr 9, 2023 at 22:05 | comment | added | Giskard | Your question is not quite clear. It seems like you expect $$ i_t = i^*_t + S_{t+1} - S_t $$ to be true? If yes: as you write, this is just a linear approximation, so exact equality is not to be expected. | |
| S Apr 9, 2023 at 20:39 | review | First questions | |||
| Apr 9, 2023 at 22:08 | |||||
| S Apr 9, 2023 at 20:39 | history | asked | TeX_novice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |