Timeline for some question on Buera and Nicolini (2004)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26 at 17:13 | history | edited | Giskard | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added links to the freely available prepublication version hosted by the lawless pirates at UCLA
|
| Mar 26 at 17:13 | comment | added | Giskard | @BakerStreet Here is the relevant page, in case you are interested econ.ucla.edu/fjbuera/papers/matFINAL2.pdf#page=12 | |
| Mar 26 at 17:10 | comment | added | Giskard | Is this $D$ still in the paper though? I thought the papers part stops at the quotation marks at the middle. | |
| Mar 26 at 17:10 | comment | added | BakerStreet | @Giskard The pseudo inverse also is unique, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore%E2%80%93Penrose_inverse, so it is difficult to say without more information what the paper of Buera and Nicolini is talking about. | |
| Mar 26 at 17:01 | comment | added | BakerStreet | @Giskard maybe, but nothing can be said without reading the paper, it sholuld be specified. | |
| Mar 26 at 16:41 | comment | added | Giskard | @BakerStreet Perhaps it is a generalized inverse? The article is "an", as in "$D$ is an inverse of $A$". In that case rank of $DA$ would be $N \leq J$ though. | |
| Mar 26 at 16:40 | comment | added | Giskard | @shk910 Is the whole first part of the question necessary, or could it be reduced to the part starting with "For an ease of notation..."? | |
| Mar 26 at 12:11 | comment | added | BakerStreet | There is something I can't understand. $A$ is a $n\times j$ matrix, if $n\neq j$ $A$ is a non-square matrix, and can't have an inverse, the inverse of a matrix is defined for square matrices only. | |
| Mar 26 at 11:51 | history | asked | shk910 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |