This is the full question: Find all pure strategy Nash equilibria of the Cournot oligopoly game with $N$ firms facing linear demand $P = a − Q$ when the total cost for each firm is $c_i(q_i) = q_i^2$.

My understanding is that:

$$\pi_i = q_i(a − Q) - q_i^2$$

$$\max_{q_i} \quad q_i(a − Q) - q_i^2$$

Therefore, the FOC:

$a - Q - 2q_i = 0$

This FOC can be derived for each firm.

This is the part that I get stuck at. How do you add all the FOCs of $N$ firms together? Thank you!


closed as off-topic by Giskard, Ubiquitous Nov 17 '16 at 9:57

  • This question does not appear to be about economics, within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think your FOC is wrong. Isn't $Q=q_1+q_2+q_3+\ldots+q_N$? But then this term should be differentiated WRT $q_i$ too. $\endgroup$ – Ubiquitous Nov 17 '16 at 7:54
  • $\begingroup$ This question is crossposted on math.SE. And since that is where questions about adding equations belong, I am voting to close it here. $\endgroup$ – Giskard Nov 17 '16 at 8:36
  • $\begingroup$ I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is a duplicate of math.stackexchange.com/questions/2017877/… $\endgroup$ – Ubiquitous Nov 17 '16 at 9:57

Your FOC is wrong.

So $$\max_{q_i} \quad q_i(a − \sum_{j=1}^nq_j) - q_i^2$$

$$\implies \max_{q_i} \quad aq_i − q_i\sum_{j=1}^nq_j - q_i^2$$

The real FOC is

$$a - \sum_{j\neq i}q_j - 2q_i - 2q_i = 0.$$

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This solution method would be correct if the OP had calculated the correct FOC to begin with. $\endgroup$ – Ubiquitous Nov 17 '16 at 9:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @KitsuneCavalry I think you might want to try again :) $\endgroup$ – Giskard Nov 17 '16 at 17:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @KitsuneCavalry Or maybe not. After all, it is a crossposted off-topic question with no visible effort... $\endgroup$ – Giskard Nov 17 '16 at 17:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ FAM that's what I had at the end @denesp you charlatan $\endgroup$ – Kitsune Cavalry Nov 17 '16 at 22:34
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The problem with this new version is that you impose symmetry before differentiating. That means that you are allowing $i$ to change not only his own quantity, but also everyone else's! My advice would be to write profit at $qi[a-Q(q_i)]-q_i^2$ and differentiate with the product rule (we know $Q'(q_i)=1$). You should get the FOC $a-Q(q_i)-q_iQ'(q_i)-2q_i=a-Nq_i-3q_i=0$ (where the first equality follows by imposing symmetry). $\endgroup$ – Ubiquitous Nov 18 '16 at 7:54

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.