1
$\begingroup$

Given a Utility function $U(c,l) = c - \frac{1}{2}l^2$ , where $c$ is the consumption and $l$ is the number of hours of labour. Let $L$ be the maximum amount of labor, so the amount of leisure is $L - l$. The wage rate is $w$.

Assume a linear tax rate $r$, where $0 < r < 1$. Also, there is a fixed transfer of $R > 0$ to every individual that is irrespective of labor supply choice. Solve for labor supply l that maximises utility.

My solution:

$c = (1-r)wl + R$ therefore we maximise $U(l) = (1-r)wl + R - \frac{1}{2}l^2$.

Differentiating $U$ w.r.t $l$ we get $(1-r)w - l = 0$; therefore $l = (1-r)w$. So this shows that $R$ has no relation to $l$. However, it should make a difference due to the income effect, so I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong :/

Thanks!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ economics.stackexchange.com/q/5933/11590 $\endgroup$ – Bayesian Mar 3 '17 at 8:17
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I don't understand why this question has been flagged for closing. The OP solved fully the exercise, and has difficulty understanding and interpreting the result -which in my opinion is one of the most valid reasons why a forum like ours should exist, to help people interpret and understand. $\endgroup$ – Alecos Papadopoulos Mar 3 '17 at 18:31
3
$\begingroup$

This has to do with the form of the utility function. Assume instead that,say, we had

$$U(c,l) = c^{1/2} - \frac{1}{2}l^2$$

Does now $R$ affect the labor-supplied decision?

Solve it and explore. Check also the link offered in a comment to your question.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.