2
$\begingroup$

I'm studying the Lab Equipment Model (Barro-Sala-i-Martin, Chapter 6). I'm having trouble when trying to prove that every variables grows at the same rate as consumption.

I was able to prove that $\dot{C}/C = g_{c}$, which is constant. Also, I have that

$b \dot{N} = Y - X - C$ where $b$ is a parameter,

$Y/N$ is a constant related to the interest rate and

$X = a^{2}Y$, where $a$ is a parameter from the production function.

From the second and third equations above, it's clear that $Y,X$ and $N$ grow at the same rate. However, it's not clear that this rate should be $g_{c}$ or even constant at all. I'm trying to use the first equation to show it, but I couldn't do it.

The book forgoes this proof. It says that it's quite similar to the AK model since there's no transitional dynamics. Is there a simple way to show this result? I think it should follow from a simple manipulation of the first equation. Any ideas? thanks a lot in advance!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ To what book are you referring? $\endgroup$ – Alecos Papadopoulos Mar 12 '17 at 22:10
  • $\begingroup$ @AlecosPapadopoulos it's this one: amazon.com/Economic-Growth-Barro-Sala-I-Martin/dp/8120325516 $\endgroup$ – Raul Guarini Mar 12 '17 at 22:35
  • $\begingroup$ In their footnote 15 the authors say that a proof that no other equilibrium exists than where all growth rates are equal and constant, can be constructed "along the lines of chapter 4". They refer to pages 208-209. $\endgroup$ – Alecos Papadopoulos Mar 12 '17 at 23:15
  • $\begingroup$ @AlecosPapadopoulos I took a serious look on your references and got the feeling of it. But on pages 208 and 209 the author strongly uses the transversality condition. My problem is that I cannot establish the correct TC here or order to replicate the proof. Could you please provide more details? $\endgroup$ – Raul Guarini Mar 14 '17 at 2:06
1
$\begingroup$

The household side of this model is pretty standard. Denote $K(t)$ be household's assets at time $t$. Then the transversality condition (which is an optimizing condition, not a constraint), is

$$\lim_{t \to \infty} [e^{-\rho t}\lambda(t) K(t)] = 0$$

where $\lambda(t)$ is the current value multiplier on assets in the Hamiltonian. Given the assumed form of the utility function we have the f.o.c.

$$\lambda(t) = \frac {1}{c(t)^{\theta}}$$

So we want

$$\lim_{t \to \infty} [e^{-\rho t}\frac {1}{c(t)^{\theta}} K(t)] = 0$$

and since in the model we have a constant consumption growth rate, $g_c$ we have

$$c(t)^{\theta} = c(0)^{\theta}\cdot e^{g_c\theta t}$$

Ignoring inconsequential constants, we require

$$\lim_{t \to \infty} [\frac {1}{e^{(\rho+g_c\theta) t}} K(t)] = 0$$

Use the relation between household assets and the number of goods $N$, the relation between income (from labor and assets) to aggregate output, as well as the expression of aggregate output as a function of $N$, to obtain a first-order linear differential equation in $N$, and proceed as in pages 208-209 of the book.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.