3
$\begingroup$

I have difficulties deriving the non-cooperative Nash Equilibrium of this problem.

The objective function is to maximize the expected total rent over the two periods, that is:

\begin{align} \max_{S_i} (1-e_i S_i + P_i(S_i, S_j) \delta(1-\underline{S})) \end{align}

with $P_i(S_i, S_j)=\frac {S_i}{S_i+S_j}$, and $i,j \in \{A,B\}$, and $e_A=1-d$ and $e_B=1+d$

$S_i$ denotes the quality of the service, $e_i$ is a parameter that captured the spending needs in $i$, $P_i(S_i, S_j)$ is the re-election probability, $\delta$ is the discount factor and $\underline{S}$ is the minimum service quality.

The solution of the Nash Equilibrium of the game is \begin{align} (S_A^*, S_B^*)=\Big(\frac{\delta (1+d)(1-\underline{S})}{4}, \frac{\delta (1-d)(1-\underline{S})}{4}\Big) \end{align}

I have tried but I don't get that same solution.

This is what I have done: I solve the maximization problem \begin{align} \frac {\partial{U_i}}{\partial{S_i}} = -e_i+\dfrac{\delta(1-\underline{S})S_j}{(S_i+S_j)^2}\stackrel{!}{=}0 \end{align}

and get the best respond function for $i$ and $j$ respectively as follows \begin{align} \delta(1-\underline{S})S_j=e_i(S_i+S_j)^2 \\ \delta(1-\underline{S})S_i=e_j(S_i+S_j)^2 \end{align}

I impose symmetry $S_i=S_j=S^*$ to the reaction function and I get this: \begin{align} \delta(1-\underline{S})S^*&=e_i(2S^*)^2 \\ S^*&=\dfrac{\delta(1-\underline{S})}{4e_i} \end{align}

I am not sure though.

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

You could add up the equations \begin{align} \delta(1-\underline{S})S_j=e_i(S_i+S_j)^2 \\ \delta(1-\underline{S})S_i=e_j(S_i+S_j)^2 \end{align} to get \begin{align} \delta(1-\underline{S})(S_i+S_j)=(e_i+e_j)(S_i+S_j)^2 \end{align} which simplifies to \begin{align} \delta(1-\underline{S})=(e_i+e_j)(S_i+S_j). \end{align} This gives you $(S_i+S_j)$. From the initial equations \begin{align} \delta(1-\underline{S})S_j=e_i(S_i+S_j)^2 \\ \delta(1-\underline{S})S_i=e_j(S_i+S_j)^2 \end{align} you can also get $$ \frac{S_j}{e_i} = \frac{(S_i+S_j)^2}{\delta(1-\underline{S})} = \frac{S_i}{e_j}, $$ which gives you $$ \frac{S_j}{S_i} = \frac{e_i}{e_j}. $$ Now you have both the sum and ratio of the variables $S_j,S_i$. Calculating their individual values should be a straightforward matter.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot!! I appreciate your taking time answering my question. $\endgroup$
    – Alfa
    Jul 8, 2017 at 8:06
  • $\begingroup$ @Alfa have you consider accepting the answer? $\endgroup$
    – luchonacho
    Jul 22, 2017 at 9:29
  • $\begingroup$ @luchonacho yes, I accept the answer. It gives me the solution. $\endgroup$
    – Alfa
    Aug 24, 2017 at 19:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Alfa To accept an answer on Stackexchange you have to press the green check sign to the left of the answer. $\endgroup$
    – Giskard
    Aug 24, 2017 at 21:29
  • $\begingroup$ @Alfa ahaha funny. Yes, you need to formally accept it :) $\endgroup$
    – luchonacho
    Aug 25, 2017 at 8:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.