3
$\begingroup$

For my master thesis, I am studying the effect of input trade liberalizaion on Research and development decision depending on firms' financial constraints in India. I have a firm level database from 1991 to 1997 (before the asian crisis). 

At a first step, I run a baseline regression with Research and development dummy as a dependant variable and input tariff, output tariff, interacted term between input tariff and importer status and some control variables. This works fine. A decrease in input tariff increases the probability to R&D. I used a fxed effect logit model and a linear probability one. 

At a second step I use Rajan and Zingales's external financial dependance. I split my sample into high constrained firms and low constrained firms and I run the exact same model for the two groups (i.e R&D dummy as dependant variable and same explicative variables). I find that the highest constrained do more research and development. I compare the two coefficients in front of input tariff variables.

At a thrid step, I use an endogenous financial variable constructed from my database = leverage ratio. This is a robustness check for rajan and zingales' method When I slipt my sample into two groups high constrained and low constrained using leverage ratio, I find the opposite, the highest constrained are doing less research and development. 

Do you have any advice for me to improve my work? 

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I dont quite understand the third step. can you include the actual regression structures that you use? $\endgroup$ – EconJohn Aug 14 '17 at 3:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.