I am baffled by this for so many years! Kindly, explain this in layman's terms (i.e. to a guy who never studied economics at a university):

I can purchase one dozen of eggs for €3.52 in Frankfurt, Germany but for ₹66 in New Delhi, India.

If I am living in India, I am in double trouble:

  1. Why is the price of goods higher in India than that of Germany with reference to people's income level?
  2. An employer is paying me such an amount of money (say,₹10,000 ≈ USD 152.52) which apparently looks larger, but in actuality, I am earning much lesser than that of a German guy (say, €1000 ≈ USD1173.96). Why am I earning less?

So, what factors make this difference?

  • $\begingroup$ Too many question under one roof. Please split them up. $\endgroup$
    – mootmoot
    Commented Oct 2, 2017 at 15:33
  • $\begingroup$ Uh, 66 rupees is about 0.87 euros. $\endgroup$
    – Hot Licks
    Commented Oct 31, 2017 at 2:10
  • $\begingroup$ @HotLicks, and, how is that relevant? $\endgroup$
    – user13954
    Commented Oct 31, 2017 at 6:30
  • $\begingroup$ You claimed the "price of goods" is higher in India than in Germany, but gave an example where eggs are about 4 times cheaper. $\endgroup$
    – Hot Licks
    Commented Oct 31, 2017 at 12:17
  • $\begingroup$ @HotLicks, its expensive with reference to people's income level which is already pointed out in #2. $\endgroup$
    – user13954
    Commented Oct 31, 2017 at 14:37

3 Answers 3


This adds to the other good answers already posted:

Different prices in different countries are a result of complex factors, which are hard to explain in one, simple way.

An example: the housing prices in Sydney are extremely high compared to Frankfurt, with the reason being the high demand of housing vs housing supply, and the lack of adequate public transportation. This is not connected with the salary you might earn in Sydney, but rather with the housing market itself. The same applies to eggs, as highlighted by mootmoot.

If you want to compare costs of living, there are some nice tools like Numbeo that compare a basket of goods between different cities.

Regarding your later comments on "maintaining currencies that are a false measure of wealth":

This is a different question already. Exchange rates and valuation / devaluation of currency can be influenced by the central bank of a country, with different aims. Many countries artificially devaluate their currency to make their exports cheaper - with a consequence that national wages are lowered compared to the rest of the world. See my answer here for more details.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Notice that most of currencies in the world float, and hence are not directly controlled by the respective central banks. $\endgroup$
    – luchonacho
    Commented Oct 3, 2017 at 7:51
  • $\begingroup$ Excellent point - corrected the post accordingly (not controlled, but influenced). There is still some degree of influence by the central banks though. And then there is inflation, which is a whole other topic... $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 3, 2017 at 7:57
  • $\begingroup$ I am accepting this answer because it quenched my main question (i.e. #2).This means citizens of poor countries will always be poor in their one lifetime.\ $\endgroup$
    – user13954
    Commented Oct 3, 2017 at 8:11
  • $\begingroup$ @anonymous thanks! I invite you to upvote other answers also, if they were helpful. While my answer explains the present (and past), I wouldn't take it as something that predicts the future. That discussion would be a new question, and here's some examples that went from poor to rich in "one lifetime": quora.com/… $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 3, 2017 at 8:23
  • $\begingroup$ @luchonacho Notice that most of currencies in the world float, and hence are not directly controlled by the respective central banks Don't you find your this logic flawed? It is like saying : Zimbabwe central bank doesn't cause inflation of money by issuing millions of new notes and pour it info market by various mean, but afterwards it is "free float", so it is not directly controlled by Zimbabwe central bank. $\endgroup$
    – mootmoot
    Commented Oct 5, 2017 at 7:13

Let EUR 1 = USD 1.17. Also, let INR 1 = USD 0.015 (these are the actual figures reported by Google on 10/2/2017)

Before we can make any meaningful comparison, we need to express the values of the dozen of eggs in a common currency. For simplicity we choose as that common currency the USD.

  1. A dozen of eggs in Frankfurt cost USD 4.142
  2. A dozen of eggs in Delhi cost USD 0.99

How did we get the USD equivalent prices?

It's straightforward: we multiplied the price of the commodity (dozen of eggs) denominated in some currency (EUR or INR) with the price of that currency denominated in USD.

Therefore, the price of a dozen of eggs is lower in Delhi than it is in Frankfurt, when the common currency in which the prices are quoted is the USD.

Let's turn now to the compensation figures:

  1. wages of INR 10,000 are equal to USD 152.58
  2. wages of EUR 1,000 are equal to USD 1,170

A employee in Germany can afford to buy 282 dozens of eggs while an employee in Delhi can afford to buy 154 dozens of eggs (divide the wage figure in USD by the price of the eggs again denominated in USD).

Therefore, if we are quoting wealth in terms of dozens of eggs that can be bought, then the employee in Germany is 1.8 times wealthier than the corresponding employee living in Delhi.

What are the contributing factors to this unequal distribution of wealth (measured in dozens of eggs-potentially-bought)?

There are three factors in play, namely

  1. the price of the commodities quoted in domestic currency (ie the price level in eg Germay or India)
  2. the price of the currencies quoted in USD (the common currency we used as a common measure)

    and lastly

  3. the level of the compensation quoted in domestic currency that each employee can command, in different countries

  • $\begingroup$ What is the point for India (i.e. all other similar countries for that matter) to keep a separate currency which is giving its citizens a false impression of wealth and also making them poorer? E.g. Zimbabwe scrapped its own currency. $\endgroup$
    – user13954
    Commented Oct 2, 2017 at 17:10
  • $\begingroup$ in what way is Zimbabwe commensurate to India? $\endgroup$
    – user14471
    Commented Oct 2, 2017 at 17:19
  • $\begingroup$ It's not about commensurating. I am asking why does a country maintain an individual currency when apparently that currency is giving a false impression of wealth? Why not adopt USD, EUR, and so on? $\endgroup$
    – user13954
    Commented Oct 2, 2017 at 17:39
  • $\begingroup$ @anonymous Your question is a trivial one that is simply based on the intuitive understanding of value based on numeric values of a currency. Taking a currency out of context and saying that a unit of currency in country x is worth way more than a unit of currency in country y and this discrepancy being wrong is presumptuous and short-sighted. There are centuries of history behind the origin of currency and no one currency is better or more 'right' than another. Plus currencies inherently carry with them the dynamics of an entire nation's market. This is necessary for international trade. $\endgroup$
    – Shiri
    Commented Oct 3, 2017 at 9:38

The eggs vs relative income is a common economy thesis for production efficiency , market efficiency, good institutional control and low income in-equality. I wouldn't call this as "free market", as free market itself may introduce syndicate price fixing. FYI, 10pcs of eggs in Germany discount store is much cheaper €1.20 ~ €2.00

To a 1st world livestock breeder, here is the advantages :

  • Technology such as advanced automated monitoring, better control use of biological control, source control, etc can reduce livestock fatality thus reduce cost and increase yield.
  • Miminise wastage. Eggs that screen out from the normal process (color or deformed) actually will be cracked and pasteurized for food manufacturing.
  • A good waste management will turn chicken waste to money
  • Knowledge sharing and cooperative. Livestock breeders are not live in Island, they will share information. Small livestock breeders even cooperate and create cooperative union to share financial burden.
  • Well establish sales channel
  • Government policy is ready when livestock owner faced problem (e.g. compensation when there is bird flu outbreak, damage control over the egg issues,etc). There is law in place to prevent cartel like price fixing.
  • Proper localisation policy in place. Germans growth some livestock feeds then relies heavily by imports.
  • low income in-equality.

On the other hand.

  • India has a huge culture problem that prevent cooperation among livestock breeders.
  • rampant corruption culture mean bad execution on incentive, loan provisioning, subsidies distributions. Poor management and bad technique means smaller livestock breeders in India are more susceptible to heavy losses when disaster hits.
  • Despite so call "free economy", there is a many oligarchy businessman cooperate with the local government, hampers the business.

With total landscape bigger than the whole West Europe, but poor government policy to manage the land, India is a livestock feeds import country. Besides India, there is many astonishing agricultural countries face similar issues.

  • $\begingroup$ this answers 1st part of the question. 2nd part is still unanswered. I think, this is not only about good management of market. it is also related to the INR's value in the international market. $\endgroup$
    – user13954
    Commented Oct 2, 2017 at 16:13
  • $\begingroup$ @anonymous Monetary policy issue should be asked in another question. $\endgroup$
    – mootmoot
    Commented Oct 5, 2017 at 7:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.