6
$\begingroup$

I believe this distinction may have been made by Hayek or some other Austrian.

$\endgroup$
10
$\begingroup$

In this paper (pdf), Peter Boettke goes into great depth explaining the difference between the two concepts in the Austrian school.

Essentially information is any data that might influence an act (or specifically the perceived utility or cost of a choice), and knowledge is the information that the actor has already collected prior to the time they made their decision and/or engaged in their behavior.

This helps to explain seemingly irrational behavior that is merely a manifestation of imperfect or asymmetric information (though it doesn't necessarily preclude or eliminate irrationality by any means).

There is also some room for "false" (or conflicting) knowledge, to provide for further irrationality (in the sense that $A$ knows $U(x)>U(y)$ and $B$ knows $U(y)>U(x)$ where $U(x)$ is the average perceived utility of $x$ for all actors in the economy.

He of course does a much better job explaining it than I do.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You know "factoid" usually means something that sounds like a fact, but is not true? $\endgroup$ – EnergyNumbers Jan 3 '15 at 4:29
  • $\begingroup$ I did not know that. Now I'm wondering if that's true or ironic. Updated just to be safe. $\endgroup$ – Jason Nichols Jan 3 '15 at 6:38
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Heh. No, it's true - the "-oid" suffix denotes something that resembles something, but is not it. Humanoid, planetoid, metalloid. More recently, "factoid" has been used to denote "a small fact" too: so the word can be used to mean one thing, and the opposite of that thing (c.f. "fulsome", which means both "whole-hearted" and "exaggerated and insincere"). $\endgroup$ – EnergyNumbers Jan 3 '15 at 8:35
1
$\begingroup$

Econ Journal Watch actually had a symposium for this very question back in 2005. It looks like there are no universally agreed upon definitions of "information" and "knowledge". Nonetheless here's a selection from the three articles in that symposium that I found the most helpful.

  • Thomas Mayer

Information [is an] isolated nugget. Knowledge [is] such nuggets of information integrated into coherent constellations, such as generalizations. Understanding is the integration of knowledge into the larger web of our other beliefs. Wisdom goes beyond understanding by adding epistemological and perhaps value and metaphysical judgments, which may, or may not, be articulated.

Mayer gives an example of his distinction between information, knowledge, and wisdom:

The observation that unemployment is at 6% provides information.

The comprehension that this figure has to be interpreted in the light of changes in the number of discouraged workers, the labor force participation rate, the NAIRU, etc., provides knowledge.

Whether this unemployment rate justifies an expansionary fiscal policy requires consideration of vaguer issues (e.g. measurement errors, policy lag). It also requires value judgments. That is, it requires wisdom.

  • Israel Kirzner

For Kirzner, the distinction is between "knowledge-as-information and action-knowledge--the latter referring to the knowledge which actually spurs and shapes action."

Alertness is necessary and sufficient for turning information-knowledge into action-knowledge.

Example: Suppose apples are selling for \$0.40 at the west end of town and for \$1 at the east end of town. John and Mary are both given this piece of knowledge-information. However, Mary is not alert and so she does not act on this piece of information. In contrast, John is alert: he realizes he can profit from this arbitrage opportunity and so acts to transform this knowledge-information into action-knowledge.

  • Leland Yeager

Yeager gives the example of voters who

are constantly exposed, even without effort on their part, to all sorts of facts and figures and arguments pertaining to policies, proposals, and candidates. Yes; but miscellaneous bits of information, casually acquired and misacquired, do not add up to knowledge, or, better expressed, surely do not add up to understanding.

Another example:

Interested in how the vote count is going in California, I might ask for the latest information or, more probably, for the latest numbers, but hardly for the latest knowledge.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.