2
$\begingroup$

Dear stack exchangers,

in the course of an internship at a microfinance bank in Tajikistan, I have been tasked with assessing the efficiency of different marketing expenses. I will try to expose the situation:

-I have monthly data (15 months)

-the individuals are cities (7 cities)

-as a regressand/dependent variable (called Y), I will be using the monthly variation in clients at the bank (three analyses: global, for deposit products, for loans. I may use the number of new clients, if it is avaible.

-my regressors/independent (called X) variables are the monthly expenses in one marketing tool (newspapers, billboard, leaflets, website ads, tv+radio), per city.

--> I'll have 105 observations to treat

My objective is to evaluate which media brings the most clients per Somoni spent. To this end, using STATA, I will conduct a panel analysis, using errors ajusted for clustering, and a fixed effect per city (the number of new customers per months may be affected, among other things, by the population of the sector).

The question that motivated this post is: how could I include spending that is national (e.g. TV/radio) into my equations, and obtain a meaningful coefficient for it?

If I include the value of national spending in each equation, then the estimated coefficient would give the average impact of national spending on Y at the city level. But national spending has an impact on all cities at the same time.

Because the coefficient is an average, I guess multiplying it by 7 (as there are 7 cities) will give me the global impact of national spending on the number of customers. What would be the problems with such a solution? What alternatives are there?

I also have two subsidiary questions:

-A lot of Xs take the 0 value. And in a lot of cases, an observation has only one X different from 0. Does this pose a particular problem, apart from those of statistical significance? (I don't think so)

-Finally, I have a few questions concerning the design of my study. Do you think that such a design will yield exploitable coefficients?

Is the exclusion of the interest rate variable a heavy problem? (I might not be able to obtain that data)

Should I worry about AR(1) problems? (maybe the number of new clients is affected by network effects, so Y(t) depends on Y(t-1))

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Large consumer good companies not using advertising because now a day every people using Network marketing. and this is a very easy and very good way to do business and is also a cost-effective and fast way to increase business. QNet is also done Network marketing business. $\endgroup$ – pidahogoj May 9 '19 at 7:38
-2
$\begingroup$

Large consumer good companies not using advertising because now a day every people using Network marketing.QNet is also done Network marketing business.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.