1
$\begingroup$

So I have been given a utility function = $ 48 R + Ry -R^2$ where $R$ represents leisure hours and $y$ represents labour income. $y=rl$, $r$ is wage rate and $l$ is labour hours. Find hours worked increases with wage. So what I thought I can do was:

I equate MRS = Slope of Budget constraint and I got something like this $(48 + y - 2R)/ R = r $ Then I equated in $R$ and got $R=48+(rl)/r+2$ Can I just now do differential of $R$ with respect to $r$

Can I continue with this method? Have I made some mistake so far? Or is this method completely wrong and is there some other method.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ In my view, this can't be solved as the relationship between $R$ and $l$ is not given, i.e. what's the total amount of hours that are shared between work and leisure? $\endgroup$
    – E. Sommer
    Commented Oct 9, 2018 at 8:42
  • $\begingroup$ But I considered $R = L*-l$ where $L*$ is maximum possible hours, some constant $\endgroup$
    – Sumukh Sai
    Commented Oct 9, 2018 at 9:04

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

It's probably easiest to insert everything into Utility $U = U(R)$, such that it depends only on one choice variable:

$U(R) = 48R + Rr(L^{*}-R)-R^2$

Deriving w.r.t. $R$ yields the first order condition:

$48 - Rr + r(L^{*}-R)-2R \overset{!}{=} 0$

Rearranging yields leisure in terms of the wage rate: $R(r) = \frac{48-L^{*}r}{3+r}$

Labor Supply $l(r)$ is hence given by: $l(r) = \frac{3L^{*}+2rL^{*}-48}{3+r}$

Deriving this by $r$ should yield what you're looking for:

$\frac{d l}{d r} = \frac{3L^{*} + 16}{(r+3)^2}$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.