2
$\begingroup$

Is there a practical difference between local non-satiation and montonicity? Can one exist in a utility function without the other?

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Monotonicity of preferences is a stronger condition than local nonsatiation. Monotonicity implies local nonsatiation, but not the other way around.

To see this:

Claim: Let $\succsim$ be a monotonic preference relation over $\mathbb{R}^n_{+}$. Therefore, $\succsim$ is locally nonsatiated.

Proof: Fix some $\varepsilon > 0$. Let there be an arbitrary $x \in \mathbb{R}^n_{+}$ and let $\mathbf{1} \in \mathbb{R}^n_{+}$ be the unit vector. For any $\lambda > 0$, we also have $x + \lambda \mathbf{1} \in \mathbb{R}^n_{+}$. Since clearly $x + \lambda \mathbf{1} \gg x,$ $x + \lambda \mathbf{1} \succ x$ by monotonicity. Consider the following metric over $\mathbb{R}^n_{+}$:

$$ d(x+\lambda \mathbf{1}, x) = ||x+\lambda \mathbf{1} -x|| = \lambda||\mathbf{1}|| = \lambda \sqrt{n}. $$

Thus for $\lambda < \frac{\varepsilon}{\sqrt{n}}$, $d(x+\lambda \mathbf{1}, x) < \varepsilon$ yet $x + \lambda \mathbf{1} \succ x$. Since $x$ was arbitrary, the existence of such a point implies that $\succsim$ is locally nonsatiated. $\blacksquare$

To show that locally nonsatiated preferences do not imply monotonic preferences, you can come up with a utility function $u(\cdot)$ over various goods that strictly increases with respect to some of the goods but reaches a satiation point for at least one of the others. For example, in $\mathbb{R}^2_{+}$:

$$ u(x_1,x_2) = x_1 - |1-x_2|. $$

A consumer with such preferences is satiated with respect to $x_2$ at $x_2=1$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.