# Implication of the concavity of u

Suppose that we have the following inequality:

$$u( y- d) - u(y-d') \ge u(y' - d) - u( y' -d')$$.

The concavity of $$u$$ together with $$y\le y'$$ then implies that $$d \le d'$$.

I sometimes come across this problem in economic papers, but I don't understand the logic behind this. Can anyone explain this?

• Please consider a more concise title, e.g. Implication of the concavity of $u$ – emeryville Jan 6 '19 at 9:54

I think you have the inequality sign wrong. The inequality as you write it cannot hold. To see this, consider the numerical case where $$y=4 > y'=3, d=1 < d'=2$$ and $$u= \sqrt(x)$$. I let you do the calculation yourself.
I suppose the correct inequality is: $$\begin{equation} u(y−d)−u(y−d') \leq u(y'−d)−u(y′−d′) \end{equation}$$
This equation holds true due to the curvature of a concave function. If you're on the upward sloping part of the function, the closer you are to the summit, the flatter the slope. So the vertical distance between the images of the two points in the domain on the left side of the equation is smaller than the same on the right side if $$y>y'$$ and $$d \leq d'$$, and equal if $$y=y'$$. On the downward sloping part it's the other way around. The set of inequality conditions imply each other. Changing one inequality requires changing the others. You can check this for yourself by picking points on a concave curve that satisfy the inequalities.
It is really just an elaborate version of $$|x| \leq |y|$$, where if $$x \leq 0, y \leq x$$ and if $$x \geq 0, y \geq x$$. I hope this answers your question.
• Thanks. I realized that I wrote the inequality of $y$ wrong. I edited it. – shk910 Jan 6 '19 at 21:21