My professor for Int. Trade insists on using his unfinished notes as a basis for the class, so I'm looking for an alternative.

The syllabus goes as follows:

Gains from trade

Free trade equilibrium and offer curves

Applications of the basic trade model Tariffs and welfare

Trade preferences

The Ricardian model

The hecksher ohlin model- fixed coefficients

The theory of international capital flows

As background: by this point we've had a few micro and macro courses, industrial organization, public economics, game theory, optimization, and linear algebra.

Thanks in advance


International Economics by Alan M. Taylor and Robert C. Feenstra is a good alternative, as International Trade by John Mclaren, which is more original.

If you look for a more advanced textbook, which discusses the underlying assumptions of the trade models, the reference is Advanced International Trade by Robert C. Feenstra.


Krugman, Obstfeld and Melitz - International Trade: Theory and Policy, is a good textbook. My professor used it to supplement his course on International Trade (advanced undergraduate level). Even though he did not follow the textbook closely, I enjoyed reading the full chapters, and it contributed to my understanding of the issues.

  • $\begingroup$ Downvote by me. There is nothing wrong with the answer, I just don't think Krugman et. al. is a good book, as the assumptions made are frequently unclear. However it is well known and liked by many people, so I am probably in the minority. $\endgroup$ – Giskard Jan 18 at 12:35
  • $\begingroup$ I respect your opinion, but I do not remember the assumptions being unclear in that textbook. And I usually get prickly when assumptions aren't clearly stated. $\endgroup$ – hrrrrrr5602 Jan 18 at 14:30
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I think in the chapters on the Ricardian model and the Heckscher-Ohlin model Krugman never explains that the results only hold if the utility functions are homothetic, which is a very strong assumption. In case of the Heckscher-Ohlin model it is also necessary to assume that both countries' productions are inner points, which is not necessarily true. $\endgroup$ – Giskard Jan 18 at 17:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Okay, I agree that those are important assumptions, but I find that it is not unreasonable to leave them out for an advanced undergraduate textbook. Those are typically things whose mathematical justification one only first encounters in graduate level micro-economics. Thanks for your clarification though. $\endgroup$ – hrrrrrr5602 Jan 18 at 18:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.