-1
$\begingroup$

If everyone's income were public information, would purely profit-seeking sellers benefit from charging different prices to people based on their different incomes? My intuition says yes because a buyer's demand for some good at a given price depends on that buyer's situation in life, including income. It seems to me that prices could be better optimized if customer information on an individual level were taken into consideration.

But I'm not sure about this. I lack the mathematical know-how to think about this thoroughly. It seems plausible that the optimal price would be the same for all customers due to competition causing prices to converge ...or something along those lines. The Wikipedia page on price discrimination brings up the issue of discount buyers reselling goods for a profit, but I think this could be avoided by limiting the quantity of a discounted good a customer can buy, and it's not an issue at all if the good can't be resold. That page also refrences coupons as an example of price discrimination because only people with a low enough income can benefit from spending time on clipping coupons.

So I think there are already some successful forms of mild price discrimination, but it doesn't seem all that common, possibly because there isn't a way for customers to prove his/her income. Could price discrimination based on income work at a larger scale if people could prove their incomes, and could this help reduce inequality?

| improve this question | |
$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This already exists - student discounts! $\endgroup$ – user17900 Feb 17 '19 at 20:32
  • $\begingroup$ Also ads. With ads you pay with your time, so effectively cost is equal to income * time (I would think). $\endgroup$ – Jonah Feb 18 '19 at 8:03
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe also credit. The APR you get on a loan depends on your income and wealth. In this case it's discrimination against the poor. $\endgroup$ – Jonah Feb 19 '19 at 23:37
  • $\begingroup$ There seem to be at least three different questions here: "would purely profit-seeking sellers benefit"?; "Could price discrimination based on income work at a larger scale?"; and "could this help reduce inequality?" I suggest you focus on one. $\endgroup$ – Kenny LJ Mar 15 at 6:18
1
$\begingroup$

This is just perfect price discrimination. Happens sometimes with niche drugs (where drug makers can know the ability of people to pay). In this scenario, consumer surplus is completely captured by suppliers.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Perfect price discrimination requires the knowledge of people's willingness to pay. But people's willingness to pay is not necessarily the same as their income. $\endgroup$ – Herr K. Feb 17 '19 at 19:01
0
$\begingroup$

The variable price structure you propose would be challenged on two fronts:

  1. straw man purchases and
  2. grey-market sales.

The most common examples of these phenomenon from an empirical standpoint are the restricted alcohol market for minors prompting straw man purchases and grey-market sales of EBT cards.

The EBT card situation is particularly interesting because it also often serves as a liquidation mechanism and de facto money-laundering system for illegal profits from the sale of illegal narcotics.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ EBT cards are a really good example of the issue of reselling the goods. I think the problem with price discrimination here is that competition will drive down prices regardless of what the buyer is willing to pay. $\endgroup$ – Jonah Mar 15 at 16:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.