3
$\begingroup$

A convex relation is that $x\succeq y$ implies $\alpha x+(1-\alpha)y\succeq y$.

Let $>_{FOSD}$ be $\succ$, is the FOSD convex? Intuitively it seems convex.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ By FOSD do you mean "first order stochastic dominance"? If so, the answer is yes. $\endgroup$
    – Herr K.
    Commented Apr 2, 2019 at 1:23
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Yes, I can think of no other relation commonly referred to as FOSD. $\endgroup$
    – Bayesian
    Commented Apr 2, 2019 at 10:58

1 Answer 1

7
$\begingroup$

The first order stochastic dominance relation is convex.

An easy way to prove this is to use the property that a cdf $F$ FOSD another cdf $G$ if and only if $F(x)\le G(x)$ for all $x$. That is, $F$ FOSD $G$ if and only if the graph of $F$ is never above the graph of $G$. It is then easy to show that $F$ is never above any convex combination $H(x)=\alpha F(x)+(1-\alpha)G(x)$, which in turn is never above $G$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.