3
$\begingroup$

If I have a market in which I have constant MC, no fixed costs, and perfect competition- when would it make sense for a new firm to enter the market(granted they have the same technology)? Would I need more information about the market?

also would the cost curves for an individual firm be 1 line since $AC=MC=AVC$ and $MR=MC$ and $P=MC$ under perfect competition, leading to $P=MC=AVC=AC=MR$

and for the market

Supply would be perfectly elastic and demand being a downward sloping curve.

$\endgroup$

closed as unclear what you're asking by Bayesian, Adam Bailey, dismalscience, Maarten Punt, EnergyNumbers Apr 17 at 10:19

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ Can you provide more information, like an attempt at a solution? $\endgroup$ – user43395 Apr 12 at 17:54
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You should provide an attempt of solution $\endgroup$ – Pedro Cavalcante Apr 12 at 19:25
1
$\begingroup$

Theoretically, if all firms are identical and have the same cost schedule, then the supply curve for the market should be perfectly elastic, as you stated. The side-by-side market and firm graphs would appear as follows:

enter image description here

This is an odd situation. Typically, when there exists a surplus of a good, firms competitively lower their prices until enough firms go out of business for the surplus to no longer exist; and when there exists a shortage, firms enter the industry until the supply increases enough for the shortage to vanish.

However, in this case, since firms are not distinguished by the price that they can afford to charge, the natural tendency towards equilibrium cannot occur this way. Instead, when there is a surplus, firms cannot compete by price lowering and will either survive or perish based on the random purchase choices of buyers (if prices are the same everywhere, consumers will probably choose where they buy their goods based on other factors, like geographic proximity, aesthetic preferences, etc, but “rational” buyers in the simplified model will be indifferent). For our purposes, which firms survive and which close down will be essentially random - whichever firms happen not to sell enough of their product for whatever reason will close.

During a shortage, it gets even weirder. Whether or not firms enter the industry depends on the location of the ATC curve (which is why I did not draw it in the above graphs). If $ATC < P_F$ at $Q_F$, firms would enter since profits are possible and people will buy the good they produce. If $ATC = P_F$ at $Q_F$, there is no telling whether firms will enter, since they will all be indifferent.

And if $ATC > P_F$ at $Q_F$, whether there is a surplus or shortage, firms will drop dead like flies until not a one is left. If the good being produced is of any real import, the government would probably offer subsidies to incentivise the production of the good.

So, to answer your question - it would make sense for you (a firm) to enter if $Q<Q_M$ and $ATC < P_F$ at $Q_F$. You could also enter when $Q\ge Q_M$, but then your success or failure would be left up to chance or other factors as consumers decide whether to buy your product or your competitor’s identically-priced product.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.