Is it ok to use corruption as a proxy for government quality?

  • $\begingroup$ Your title and your body is asking two different questions, I like the title more :) $\endgroup$
    – Alex
    Commented Apr 24, 2019 at 6:42

1 Answer 1


Using corruption is part of it but a bit restrictive way to measure government "quality". You may use aggregate indicators as the one developed by the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) project from the World Bank. They reports aggregate and individual governance indicators for over 200 countries and territories over the period 1996–, for six dimensions of governance:

  1. Voice and Accountability
  2. Political Stability and Absence of Violence
  3. Government Effectiveness
  4. Regulatory Quality
  5. Rule of Law
  6. Control of Corruption

What is Governance ?

According to the WGI project Governance consists of the traditions and institutions by which authority in a country is exercised. This includes the process by which governments are selected, monitored and replaced; the capacity of the government to effectively formulate and implement sound policies; and the respect of citizens and the state for the institutions that govern economic and social interactions among them.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you but since it was only from 1996 I used Bayesian corruption index instead so that I could have more data. $\endgroup$
    – Ry G
    Commented Apr 24, 2019 at 9:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.