3
$\begingroup$

This is from Hopkins and Kornienko (2010). In this model, $x$ is investments, $s$ is status, and $y=z-x$ is leisure, where $z$ is endowments. $x(r)$ is the optimal investment, and the relative investments determine the status in the model. Here they characterize the agent with the rank, $r$, and derive the reduced form utility. But, I am not quite sure about how the envelope theorem works here.

If I differentiate $U(r)$ with respect to $r$ and suppress the arguments, I have that $$U_x x' + U_y(y'-x') + U_s s'.$$ I know that $Z'(r) = \frac{1}{g(Z(r))}$, where $g$ is the density of $z$. This implies that the first term and third term and $U_yx'$ turn out to be zero to make the above equation equal to Equation (8). My understanding is that $U_x = U_s = 0$ since $x(r)$ is the optimal investment. But, I don't know how to explain the elimination of $U_yx'$. Can anyone give me some help?

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What does $p$ stand for in $Z'(p)$? $\endgroup$ – Bertrand May 12 at 18:34
  • $\begingroup$ @Bertrand It should be $Z'(r)$. Sorry. $\endgroup$ – shk910 May 13 at 0:05
1
$\begingroup$

From the first order condition for optimality, we know that (equation (4) in the paper):

$$U_x(x,Z(r)-x,S(r))x'(r) - U_y(x,Z(r)-x,S(r))x'(r) + U_s(x,Z(r)-x,S(r))S'(r)=0.$$

When differentiating ${\bf U}(r)$ with respect to $r$, we find your expression: $$U_x(x(r),Z(r)-x(r),S(r))x'(r) + U_y(x(r),Z(r)-x(r),S(r))(Z'(r)-x'(r)) + U_s(x(r),Z(r)-x(r),S(r))S'(r).$$

Replacing the first equation into the last one yields $${\bf U}'(r)=U_y(x(r),Z(r)-x(r),S(r))Z'(r).$$

Now, $Z'(r)=1/g(Z(r))$ which gives equation (8).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.