# Understanding the gradient of the social cost curve in a market failure/ negative externalities diagram Why does the social cost supply curve in a negative externalities diagram have a steeper gradient than the private cost to firms?

I assumed it should only be shifted upwards as the negative social costs are directly proportional to the production quantity?

Any explanation is greatly appreciated.

It simply depends on the shape of the marginal external damages. If the total damages are linear in output, then the marginal damages are constant, and the gradient of the marginal social cost is the same as that of the marginal private cost.

If the total damages are quadratic (or some other form with increasing marginal damages), the marginal social cost has a steeper slope than the marginal private cost.

In a simple example: if the marginal private costs are $$MPC(Q)=70+2Q$$, where $$Q$$ is quantity produced and total damages are $$D(Q)=50Q$$, then marginal external damages are $$MED=50$$ and the marginal social costs of production would be:

$$MSC=MPC+MED=70+2Q+50=120+2Q$$

If in contrast the damage function would be $$D(Q)=50Q+2Q^2$$, then marginal external damages would be $$MED=50+4Q$$ and the marginal social costs of production:

$$MSC=MPC+MED=120+6Q$$

As you can see the latter has a steeper slope than the original MPC, whereas the former does not.

• Thanks for the great explanation! – Luke Wanless May 29 '19 at 10:49