I'm trying to understand the tools used/presented in Lars Hansen's Econometrica paper "Dynamic Valuation Decomposition within Stochastic Economies." In a part in the paper, Hansen introduces a long-term approximation. This approximation first requires us to solve for a principle eigenfunction of a kind of conditional expectation operator. As an exercise, I'm trying to solve the following example. $\newcommand{\E}{\mathbb E}$ Suppose that $$ X_{t+1} = A X_t + B W_{t+1} $$ where A has stable eigenvalues and $\{W_{t+1} : t = 0,1,... \}$ is an iid sequence of multivariate standard normally distributed random vectors. Suppose that $$ \log M_{t+1} - \log M_t = D \cdot X_t + F \cdot W_{t+1}. $$ I want to show that there exists a solution to the equation $$ \E \left [ \frac{M_{t+1}}{M_t} e(X_{t+1}) \mid X_t = x \right ] = \exp(\eta) e(x) \tag{1} $$ for $\log e(x) = H \cdot x.$ I also want to compute that value of $\eta$.


The beginning of the problem is straightforward. Using the properties of log-normal random variables, we can calculate from (1) \begin{align} \exp\{ (D' + H'A) x + \frac 12 (F' + H' B)'(F' + H'B)\} &= \exp\{\eta + H' x\} \\ (D' + H'(A - I)) x + \frac 12 (F' + H'B)'(F' + H'B) &= \eta. \end{align} This is probably a simple question from here. It seems clear that a solution exists, and I have solved for $\eta.$ But from what I understand, solving this problem involves making a "guess" that $e$ was linear in $x$. I don't know what $H$ is. Thus, I need to solve for $H$ and $\eta$. How would I do this?

Note: This problem is related to this problem about the "Decomposition of an additive functional into a Martingale part and other."

  • $\begingroup$ What does M(t+1)/M(t) represent? $\endgroup$
    – Rusan Kax
    Jan 14 '15 at 16:22
  • $\begingroup$ In this exercise, no interpretation is given. In the paper it is defined similarly, where it is used to "model stochastic growth, stochastic discounting, or the product of the two." The $M$ is just indicating that it is a multiplicative functional. $\endgroup$
    – jmbejara
    Jan 14 '15 at 17:02

The progress given so far appears to be correct. Finishing this problem just requires us to argue that $H$ must be chosen so that the equation $$ (D' + H'(A - I)) x + (F + H'B)'(F + H'B) = \eta $$ holds for all $x$. Thus, we must have $D' + H'(A - I) = 0$ and, consequently, $H' = D'(I-A)^{-1}$. This implies that $\eta = (F' + H'B)'(F' + H'B)$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.