One opinion voiced (in The Economist) around the 2008 recession was that:

Decoupling does not mean that an American recession will have no impact on developing countries. That would be daft. The point is that their GDP-growth rates will slow by much less than in previous American downturns.

In hindsight, how did this pan out?

I seem to recall that some Eastern European countries, e.g. Estonia (and actually all 3 Baltic states) had a much worse recession in the aftermath than the US did (~15% contraction of GDP for 2009 compared to 2.5% for the US). But how did this alleged decoupling from the US economy fare on average for the emerging markets in aftermath of 2008?


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.