I am considering a regression discontinuity design (RD) where the "treatment" has a definite sorting rule (below the threshold, you are not fined - above the threshold, you are fined). The outcome I am considering is how much you are fined the FOLLOWING year. There are 4 options: 1) remain without a fine, 2) go from no fine to fined, 3) fined less than you were the previous year, or 4) fined more than you were the previous. While I have listed these as categorical, I have the continuous amount of the fine as well.

Here are my questions: 1.) I have never seen a "longitudinal" RD design where the treatment is at a time period before the outcome. Are there any methodological issues with this approach? 2.) Assuming this approach is valid, how best should I model the outcome given the multiple possibilities?

Thanks in advance for any advice!

  • $\begingroup$ If I understand correctly, what you have is panel data. Each individual time-series is the fines imposed on a single entity, and each observation in each time series is the amount of fine (so a value of $0$ means "no-fine" this period). So, also, all numbers in the data set are non-negative. Correct? $\endgroup$ – Alecos Papadopoulos Jan 21 '15 at 8:41
  • $\begingroup$ Correct on all accounts. $\endgroup$ – oncearunner Jan 21 '15 at 9:30

The fact that your outcome is measured at a later point in time than the treatment is not a problem, and not unusual either - this is true to some extent in all RD studies (if this were not the case, there couldn't be causation).

As for how to analyze your outcome, I suggest a couple of different specifications. First, you should use the continuous fine measure as an outcome. Second, you could use an indicator variable equal to 1 if they got a fine, and equal to zero if they didn't. You might be able to do similar dummy regressions for the more/less cases too, but that's a little more complicated. If you want to be a little more advanced, it would certainly be interesting to take the RD framework to a tobit model. Shouldn't be too complicated, I expect, but I haven't thought that much about it.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.