0
$\begingroup$

Let $\succsim$ complete and $x, y, z \in X$. Suppose $x \succsim y$ and $y \succsim z$. Is it OK to write $x \succsim y \succsim z$ just knowing this?

Or, on the contrary, such expression automatically implies $x \succsim z$?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ This seems more like a math question. (Math notation specifically, so very little microeconomics is involved.) Also, it boils down to whether writing $$ 5 > 2 < 3 $$ is okay. These are two different inequalities, but I was lazy and did not write the symbol 2 again. But this clearly does not imply anything about the relationship of 5 and 3. $\endgroup$
    – Giskard
    Oct 1, 2019 at 17:37
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Strictly speaking, $\succsim$ symbolizes a binary relation, and so should be used as one. Writing "$x\succsim y\succsim z$" as a shorthand for "$x\succsim y$ and $y\succsim z$" is an abuse of notation and should only be used within an appropriate context where confusion/misinterpretation is unlikely. $\endgroup$
    – Herr K.
    Oct 1, 2019 at 21:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ To be clear, you can't conclude that $x \succsim z$ without assuming transitivity. $\endgroup$
    – Art
    Oct 2, 2019 at 16:45

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.