0
$\begingroup$

The question in the title sounds like a trick question, due to the monotonicity property that indifference curves have, such that for two goods x and y, strong monotonicity implies y > x.

Possible that you could answer the question by stipulating the area under a curve?

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ You should specify every one of your assumptions/conditions more clearly. In particular, do you require strong monotonicity? $\endgroup$ – Kenny LJ Jan 13 at 2:10
2
$\begingroup$

$$u(x, y) = 2$$ is a simple example of a continuous utility function with thick indifference curve.

\begin{eqnarray*} u(x, y)= \begin{cases} x & x < 1 \\ 1 & 1 \leq x < 2 \\ x - 1 & x \geq 2 \end{cases} \end{eqnarray*}

is another continuous utility function with thick indifference curve for $u=1$.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

How about a utility function that only enjoys discrete quantities. This takes discrete values but allows for continuous inputs.

$$U(x,y) = (floor(x))^{\alpha} \cdot (floor(y))^{1-\alpha}$$

enter image description here


    import numpy as np
    import seaborn as sns
    import pandas as pd
    import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

    x = np.arange(0, 10, 0.01)
    y = np.arange(0, 10, 0.01)
    alpha = 0.7

    xv, yv = np.meshgrid(x, y)

    def U(x1,y1, alpha1):
        return(np.floor(x1)**alpha1 * np.floor(y1)**(1-alpha1))

    uv = U(xv,yv, alpha)

    fig, ax = plt.subplots()
    CS = ax.contourf(xv, yv,uv, levels=np.unique(uv))
    ax.set_xlabel('x')
    ax.set_ylabel('y')
    plt.colorbar(CS)
    plt.show()

If it must be strongly monotonic and differentiable, then no, I believe this is impossible. An agent's preferences are said to be strongly monotonic if, given a consumption bundle $x$, the agent prefers all consumption bundles $y$ that have more of at least one good, and not less in any other good. That is $y\geq x$ and $y\neq x$ imply $y\succ x$. If this is a continuous and differentiable utility function then this means: $$ \frac{\partial U}{\partial X_{i}} > 0 \: \forall i$$ This implies that the indifference curves cannot be fat. Consider being on a thin indifference curve and, holding fixed x, increasing y by an infinitesimal amount. This will increase utility by $\frac{\partial U}{\partial y}$, which we just stipulated is positive. So you must be moving onto a higher indifference curve and therefore it is not "fat" in the y direction. Similarly, taking an infinitesimal step in the x direction holding fixed y increase utility by $\frac{\partial U}{\partial x}$, which we also just stipulated is positive. So this utility function cannot have fat indifference curves.

I am unsure if this also is true for non-differentiable utility functions.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ But this again violates (strong) monotonicity. $\endgroup$ – Kenny LJ Feb 15 at 4:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.