0
$\begingroup$

I am doing a report on whether environmental regulation has an impact on trade, using a difference-in-difference model and seeing whether the EU Industrial Emissions Directive had an effect on UK trade. The UK is my treatment group and Australia is my control group. However, what is the best way to control for bilateral trade between the two? Would I need bilateral trade data on UK and Australia trade or can I just use a dummy variable? If I am using a dummy variable, how can I use it? Thanks!

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Trade between the two is a violation of SUTVA. $\endgroup$
    – Papayapap
    Commented Feb 28, 2023 at 19:07

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

I can’t imagine what dummy could you use there. Here trade is your dependent variable if you would use dummy you would have to switch to some non-linear probabilistic model such as logit or probit.

Most of the time I see papers using just exports from country i to j as proxy for bilateral trade. But there are multiple ways how you could in principle measure it, and it’s not easy to provide some short review of all possible ways. For example, more sophisticated metric would be to measure it in terms of value added like here. It would really depend on exact situation, I would maybe recommend starting with the exports from UK to AU for UK and vice versa for AU and then move onto more fancy measures, it might be good idea to do extensive robustness checks using different possible metrics.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.