1
$\begingroup$

In the Alesina and Rodrik (1994) study on the impact of inequality on growth, why did they include a dummy for democracies in their empirical estimation? In other words, why did they want to study whether the impact would be different for democracies vis-a-vis non-democracies?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Welcome, I changed the title and added a ungated version of the paper. $\endgroup$ – emeryville Apr 6 at 15:41
1
$\begingroup$

Alesina and Rodrik (1994) wanted to study whether the impact would be different for democracies vis-a-vis non-democracies because they show that

in a democracy (where the ``median voter theorem'' applies) the rate of taxation is higher and the rate of growth lower, the more unequal is the distribution of wealth.

Their model implies that democracies with a more unequal distribution of capital ownership grow less rapidly than more egalitarian democracies. They argue this is because the median voter has a relatively small endowment of capital when wealth is unequally distributed, and thus favors high taxes on capital which keep growth low.

They wanted to estimate this prediction by adding a dummy variable for democracies vis-a-vis non-democracies

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.