4
$\begingroup$

Suppose a consumer whose income is $b$ has a utility function given by $U(x,y) = 2xy+y^2$ with the price of $x$ being $p_x$ and the price of $y$ being $p_y$.

Draw the price-consumption curve assuming $y$ is an inferior good (keep the price of $x$ constant).

If we set up the Lagrangian $$ L = 2xy+y^2 + \lambda \cdot (b - p_xx-p_yy) $$

and solve the maximization problem, we'll end up with

$$x(p_x,p_y,b) = \left( \frac{p_y-p_x}{2p_xp_y - p_x^2} \right) \cdot b, \,\,\,\, y(p_x,p_y,b) = \left( \frac{p_x}{2p_xp_y - p_x^2} \right) \cdot b $$

If $y$ is to be inferior, then we must have (considering income and prices to be strictly positive)

$$ \frac{\partial y(p_x,p_y,b)}{\partial b} < 0 \implies \left( \frac{p_x}{2p_xp_y - p_x^2} \right) < 0 \Leftrightarrow 2p_xp_y - p_x^2 < 0 $$

However, in order for the amount consumed of $y$ to be non-negative, we must have

$$ \left( \frac{p_x}{2p_xp_y - p_x^2} \right) \cdot b \geq 0 \Leftrightarrow 2p_xp_y - p_x^2 \geq 0 $$

Thus, we can conclude that if the demand for $y$ is to be non-negative at strictly positive prices and income, then $y$ can't be an inferior good.

However, if we respect the condition given by the non-negativity of $y$, we can still plot the price-consumption curve. Taking the following pairs of prices

$$ (p_x,p_y) = \{ (1,1),(1,3),(1,5) \}$$

and letting $b = 48$, we'll have:

$$\begin{cases} x(1,1,48) = 0, y(1,1,48) = 48 \\ x(1,3,48) = 9.60, y(1,3,48) = 9.60 \\ x(1,5,48) \approx 21.34, y(1,5,48) \approx 5.34 \end{cases}$$

Plotting these values on a graph, we have:

Price-consumption curve for y

Is my answer correct?

Thanks!

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You seem to have inferred the shape of the curve from just 3 points. It would have been safer to test whether the U-shape is correct by also calculating $x,y$ at $(1,4,48)$. $\endgroup$ – Adam Bailey May 15 at 11:23
  • $\begingroup$ You are completely right! If had I done that I'd have noticed that the price-consumption is piece-wise linear! $\endgroup$ – Pedro Cunha May 15 at 15:16
4
$\begingroup$

It's true that given the utility function the $y$-good is a normal good, so the question is quite odd. Ignoring this, your calculations are correct, but you could simplify to $y(p_x,p_y,b)=\frac{b}{2p_y-p_x}$.

Your curve contains a mistake, since $x(1,3,48)=19.2$. Indeed by substituting your expressions for $x$ and $y$ you can show that $2x+y=\frac{b}{p_x}$ as long as $p_y\ge p_x$, so the price-consumption curve is piecewise linear.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, I think my professor mixed something up. I'll rectify my answer and make it correct. Thank you! $\endgroup$ – Pedro Cunha May 15 at 15:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It doesn't make much sense to edit your question and correct your own answer, since now Adam Bailey's comment and my answer refer to a version which is no longer visible. $\endgroup$ – VARulle May 15 at 23:50
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry. I've rolled it back $\endgroup$ – Pedro Cunha May 16 at 1:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.