Just to be careful, the above equivalence need not hold in general games. Consider the following game (which is a modified matching pennies):
$$\begin{array}{c|c|c|c|}
& \text{H} & \text{T} & \text{P}\\ \hline
\text{H} & (1,-1) & (-1,1) & (-2,-2) \\ \hline
\text{T} & (-1,1) & (1,-1) & (-2,-2) \\ \hline
\text{P} & (-2,-2) & (-2,-2) & (-2,-2) \\ \hline
\end{array}$$
This game has a pure strategy nash equilibrium $(P,P)$ which yields -2 to each player.
However, a mixed strategy of the game involves $\big\{\frac{1}{2}\circ H; \frac{1}{2}\circ T; 0 \circ P\big\}$ for each player (i.e. each player randomizes uniformly between H and T). This mixed strategy yields a value of 0 to each player. The issue arises because there may be Nash Equilibria in (weakly) dominated strategies.