4
$\begingroup$

In the classic formula for GDP, i.e., GDP=C+I+G+X-M, where are remittances accounted for? With remittances as high as third of GDP for developing countries, I wonder how they are not explicit in this equation.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

Gross domestic product (GDP) is the total value of output in an economy, this can be measured only by Output using this formula.

This method uses GDP = C + I + G + (X-M) where

C: Consumption (Household spending)
I: Investments 
G: Government spending 
X: Exports from an economy 
M: Imports into an economy

The remittances that you mention about are not made against any services. While remittances can be a source of GDP growth by increasing household consumption, it does not directly add to GDP, it does affect GNP though.

For a clear comparison of these two terms GDP and GNP use this

Alternatively you can use incomes to calculate GDP, however note that even in that method you add only those incomes that are made from the production of goods and services are included and not transfers

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ But this World bank link says remittances are as high as a third of GDP. Why say so, if remittances are not a part of GDP at all? $\endgroup$ – Bravo Dec 1 '14 at 13:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I could compare illegal income as a percentage of GDP as well, or black money as a percentage of GDP too :) but they are all not part of GDP, its just to show the numbers as significant $\endgroup$ – skv Dec 1 '14 at 13:37
  • $\begingroup$ I see your point. If the remittances are deposited in fixed account in a bank, then they do enter the GDP as part of 'Investment', right? $\endgroup$ – Bravo Dec 1 '14 at 13:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, as soon as it reaches someone, they can either "spend" it or "invest" it and then it becomes part of GDP that way (as spending/investment) $\endgroup$ – skv Dec 1 '14 at 13:43
  • $\begingroup$ @Bravo But note that remittances are often going to be in the wrong currency. They would generally be spent on imports either directly or after being exchanged for the local currency. Imports are subtracted from GDP, so even if you can trace spending or investment back to a remittance, it won't necessarily count towards GDP. $\endgroup$ – Brythan Dec 1 '14 at 16:50
0
$\begingroup$

I disagree with the above answer.

In the classic formula for GDP, i.e., GDP=C+I+G+X-M,

Remittances get accounted by mostly from the C factor. Remittances are used by the families back home for additional expenditure - like mobiles, household appliances, eating out, vacation etc.

Even savings eventually are used to build a new house, or fund education or the marriage. SO remittances do get accounted for the in the actual GDP.

If one uses the money earned form abroad in setting up a new business back home, that would come under factor I = Investment.

YOU can ask go talk to an economist who can explain it better.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Welcome to the site. Please note that if you post an answer it is up to you to justify what you say, not to suggest that the questioner talks to an economist. Our guidelines on answers are here. $\endgroup$ – Adam Bailey Apr 11 at 10:12
  • $\begingroup$ Hi, welcome to Economics:Stack Exchange. Please consider improving the answer by adding references from reputable and scholarly sources. As many other science stacks do, we require formal proofs, statistical evidence or links to external sources for answers making claims which are not common knowledge. Unsourced material can be edited or deleted. For more details see our help center and FAQ on community standards for answers $\endgroup$ – 1muflon1 Apr 11 at 11:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.