# Comparing utility functions [closed]

I'm doing an econ course after not having any math or micro for a few years, now I'm totally missing the basics again. I'm wondering how to show that utility functions are an equivalent to each other: 3xy+2, (xy)^2, e^xy, lnx + lny

should be equal to xy.

Could someone explain me in words what to do? Do you have to take the derivative or can it also be found in another way?

I've seen this post, but for me the explanation is too mathematical. How can I tell if 2 different utility functions represent the same preferences?

Kind regards and thanks for your help!

• I think the answer you linked already explains this in very simple terms. The answer does not even include much mathematics as all just uses simple concept of function itself. If that answer is too mathematical for you then any answer to your particular problem will be too mathematical as well. In that case you simply need to catch up on your math skills.
– 1muflon1
Sep 27, 2020 at 10:25

A utility function is a tool that's used to determine, given two options, which one someone would take. The idea is that we look at what utility each option has, and the person will take the one with the higher utility. For this test, we only look at which is larger, not the absolute size. So if you have two functions $$f$$ and $$g$$ that always give the same order, they are equivalent with respect to this test. That is, given any two options $$a$$ and $$b$$, if $$f(a), then $$g(a).
Now, if we set $$f$$ to $$(x,y) \rightarrow xy$$ and $$g$$ to $$(x,y) \rightarrow (xy)^2$$, we can introduce $$h: u \rightarrow u^2$$. Then $$g(x,y) = h(f(x,y)$$. In other words, $$g$$ is $$h$$ composed with $$f$$. If we assume that $$x$$ and $$y$$ are positive, then $$h$$ is monotonically increasing, and thus composing it with any function doesn't change ordering; if $$n, then $$n^2 (again, for positive numbers). Any time two functions are such that one can be written as a monotonically increasing function composed with the other, the two functions are equivalent with respect to ordering.
However, it is important to note that utility functions are also used for evaluating a concept called "lotteries". This is where someone chooses between options that involve different probabilities of different outcomes. For instance, someone might have a choice between "1% chance of getting \$1m and 99% of getting nothing" versus "100% chance of getting \$100k". When evaluating lotteries, the functions that you list are not equivalent when applied to the outcomes.