The 1975 Nobel Prize winner in Economics was Kantorovich who reformulated the optimal transportation theory of Monge and applied it to optimal resource allocation. The Wasserstein distance is central to this optimization model.

Can anyone familiar with optimal transport give an overview of some of its applications to economics? maybe beyond just moving mass/products to separate destination points. It's hard to understand how production, consumption and pricing comes into the picture compared to non-economics optimal transport.

If they even are still in use, how have these methods been developed and improved for economists in recent publications?


Optimal transport methods are very much still in use in economics. The show up in two-sided matching with side-payments, contract theory, hedonic pricing, partial identification in econometrics, and a couple of other areas. You can find an excellent overview of economic applications in the 2016 book Optimal Transport Methods in Economics by Alfred Galichon.

  • $\begingroup$ I have it but don't get how production and consumption enter the Wasserstein formula. could you explain that, and the applications you listed $\endgroup$ – develarist Nov 7 '20 at 15:55
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure where consumption and production come in. I guess by "Wasserstein formula" you mean the Wasserstein distance? In many applications, one uses more general functions. Sketching out the application needs a lot of space though. $\endgroup$ – Michael Greinecker Nov 7 '20 at 19:20
  • $\begingroup$ What is more general than the Wasserstein distance? I think how consumption, production and pricing come in is important for the answer, versus non-econ transport problems $\endgroup$ – develarist Nov 8 '20 at 9:22
  • $\begingroup$ The Wasserstein distance minimizes the integral of a metric over all couplings. But you can solve the minimization problem for much more general functions of two variables than a metric and that is important for applications. I don't know of applications of optimal transport to consumption and production theory. In matching, pricing comes in via Kantorovich duality. That is all in the book. $\endgroup$ – Michael Greinecker Nov 8 '20 at 9:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.