Is there any (theoretical?) work on "gamification" in game theory?

I do not have a proper definition of gamification, but StackExchange would be an example. Contributers like us provide a costly service without monetary compensation, but in exchange for fictional reputation points or badges that do not mean much -- other than it being fun to obtain them. I certainly would not post anything without the "game aspect" implying a certain non-monetary payoff that can be designed. Moreover, it is different than other non-monetary services like organizing workshops or refereeing, which at least have real-life consequences for my professional reputation.

  • $\begingroup$ I am not an expert on game theory but just putting game theory and gamification as key words in google scholar yields a lot of results many of them containing theoretical models. Are you looking for something specific? $\endgroup$ – 1muflon1 Nov 19 '20 at 16:26
  • $\begingroup$ I would be happy about any approach. I did not see anything in (theoretical) economics journals about that. $\endgroup$ – Bayesian Nov 19 '20 at 16:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For example, this was one of the top searches: dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/… - it even mentions stack overflow $\endgroup$ – 1muflon1 Nov 19 '20 at 16:33

It seems that there is already some prior work on theory of gamification from game theory perspective. For example, Easley & Ghosh (2016), provide theory on optimal badge design even explicitly mentioning sites like StackOverflow and their paper seems to be highly cited. Hamari, Huotari & Tolvanen (2015) have article titled "Gamification and economics" which offers a survey of uses of gamification in various economic concepts. The paper itself does not seem to offer any novel models but it offers a literature review with a chapter specifically focusing on game theory.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ (+1) Thx, Arpita Ghosh indeed seems to have a bunch of relevant papers on the subject, like the JET with Patrick Hummel or papers with Preston McAfee (who always writes great stuff)! Let me leave the question open for a while as other may also want to chip in. I can accept your answer later. $\endgroup$ – Bayesian Nov 19 '20 at 17:11
  • $\begingroup$ @Bayesian glad that I could be of help, also of course please keep it open I am not expert on this issue hopefully someone can hook you up with even better sources $\endgroup$ – 1muflon1 Nov 19 '20 at 17:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.