My question is from over lapping generations

Question is as follows

enter image description here

I found that

$$k(t+1)= \frac{\beta(1-\alpha)}{(1+\beta)(1+n)}A(t)k(t)^{\alpha}$$

How can I deal with A(t) to find the steady state $k^*$? By the way, at steady state,$ k(t+1)=k(t)=k^*$


Is that derivation for $k(t+1)$ correct? Technically, you never reach the steady state, but only asimptotically as $t\rightarrow\infty$, but at infinity the $A(t)$ will also be infinite because it grows exponentially with time. I suspect that $k(t+1)$ should depend on $(1+g)$ instead of $A(t)$.

Usually these models are expressed in units of effective labor, that is, dividing the capital stock $K(t)$ and the labor $L(t)$ (and hence, the production and consumption) by $N(t)$ and $A(t)$.

  • $\begingroup$ This is much better posed as a comment, you don't answer the problem. Also as you can see this is not one of those problems in which we impose Harrod-neutral technological progress. While your point is valid, that is not what is being used for this specific problem $\endgroup$ – Brennan Jan 22 at 5:55
  • $\begingroup$ SE does not allow me to write comments. My point is that the capital stock, as is expressed in the formula written by OP does not have a steady state, because $A(t)$ grows exponentially. Maybe OP can share how he arrived at that law of motion for capital. $\endgroup$ – Pekisch Jan 22 at 19:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.