0
$\begingroup$

Usually the definition of necessary goods is the income elasticity between 0 and 1. But can a good with -0.5 income elasticity be considered necessary? There is this link that says that all the inferior goods are necessities: “Lastly, note that all inferior products are clearly necessities, but necessities include normal products with elasticities between zero and one.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ In my opinion, these are not very good definitions :) The problem is that inferiority of a good is a "local" property. A good is inferior at some income level. The definitions above make no mention of this. $\endgroup$
    – Giskard
    May 13 at 15:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.