My question may sound more econometrical than about economics at the begining, but it is the contrary.

I am working with a panel data of about 150 countries and it is cointegrated. My variables are GDP, capital accumulation and another variable which nexus with GDP is expected to be country specific. Therefore, I am using estimators which average country specific coefficients (I mean, not pooled estimators). When I observe the panel specific coefficients for capital accumulation, I got some coefficients which were significant and negative and others which surpass 1.

In theory, the coefficient for capital accumulation is expected to be between 0 and 1, but I have seen some published articles in prestigious journals where the coefficient for capital was a little larger than 1. On the other hand, I have never seen an article with a negative and significant coefficient for capital.

I have read that when you obtain outliers or no sense coefficients in some panels, it is good idea to remove those cases (those countries in my case). I am certain about deleting the countries which regression yielded negative and significant coefficient for capital. However, I am not sure about which cut off I should use for the coefficients which are larger than 1. I am considering to delete the countries where I obtained a significant coefficient larger than 1.1. Is this a reasonable procedure? Or should I remover the nations where the coefficient is just larger than 1? Or should consider another cut off? Or should I keep the panel as it is (not removing any country)?

Very much thank you in advance,



Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.