1
$\begingroup$

As we know, sample size can play a role in reaching statistical significance, provided that splitting the quant world in what is and what is not statistically significant is probably an overestimated/oversold approach.

My friend sends me a link and saying that from this document, we can conclude that "laws effect on different settings with different sizes is simply a matter of fact".

I read this short document but still cannot understand how to reach this conclusion. What I am doing is to try to address this question. Simply speaking, the significant level are different between international sample and non-US sample.

$\endgroup$

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.