3
$\begingroup$

I have the expenditure function: $$e(p,u)=\left(p_1^{\rho/{\rho-1}}+p_2^{\rho/{\rho-1}}\right)^{{\rho-1}/\rho}u$$ where $u$ is the utility, $p_1,p_2$ prices and $\rho$ a parameter. How do I derive the indirect utility function?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Doesn't the textbook, (I assume you are using some source), provide the answer? It is one word. So it is not a matter of "calculation" but a matter of understanding why the two are connected in such a way. $\endgroup$ – Alecos Papadopoulos Mar 15 '15 at 22:37
3
$\begingroup$

Mas-Colell, Whinston, Green chapter 3, especially p. 75 explains this. One possible way is $v(p,w)=e(p,v(p,w))$ where $v$ is the indirect utility function, $p$ the price vector and $w$ the wealth.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ There is a mistake in Figure 3.G.3 on page 75. Since e(p,u) represents expenditure, it equals to wealth (w). w ≡ e (p, v (p, w)) u(x(p,w))≡ u(h(p,u) ≡ v (p, e (p, u)) $\endgroup$ – z.a. Nov 2 '18 at 10:03
  • $\begingroup$ This seems more like a comment on this answer than an answer to this question. $\endgroup$ – Brythan Nov 3 '18 at 0:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.