I have a compact subset of $\mathbb{R}$, $X$. An agent has a continuous, transitive and complete preference relation $\succsim$ over $X$. I am wondering whether there exists a $y\in X$ such that $y\succsim x$ for all $x\in X$. I have the following so far:

If $X$ were simply closed, then the answer would be no. This is because we could define the preference relation: $x\succsim y$ iff $x\geq y$ on $\mathbb{R}$ (which is a closed set). Clearly, there is no maximal element.

But I am not sure about the case in which $X$ is compact.

Thank you

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hint: Use extreme value theorem and the result that a continuous, transitive and complete preference relation can be represented by a continuous utility function. $\endgroup$
    – Herr K.
    Sep 20, 2021 at 15:36

1 Answer 1


Yes, compactness is sufficient and no need to restrict yourself to subsets of $\mathbb{R}$.

The proof is by contradiction. Assume that $\succeq$ has no greatest element. Consider the sets: $$ V_x = \{y \in X| x \succ y\} $$ These are open sets as $\succeq$ is continuous. If $(V_x)_{x \in X}$ do not cover $X$ then there is an $y$ that is no set $V_x$ for all $x$. This means that for all $x \in X$, $x \not \succ y$, so $y \succeq x$ for all $x$, which means that $y$ is the greatest element a contradiction.

From this, it follows that $(V_x)_{x \in X}$ is an open cover of $X$. By compactness, it has a finite subcover, say $V_{x_1},\ldots, V_{x_n}$. By completeness and transitivity, we can find $x_i \in \{x_1, \ldots, x_n\}$ such that $x_i \succeq x_j$ for all $j \in \{1,\ldots, n\}$.

Now for any $y \in X$ either $y = x_j$ for some $j$ which means $x_i \succeq y = x_j$ or $y \in V_{x_j}$ for some $j$ which means that: $$ x_i \succeq x_j \succ y. $$ So $x_i$ is a greatest element, which gives the desired contradiction.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.