1
$\begingroup$

Suppose there is a representative household of unit mass who lives forever. Preferences are given as: $$\sum\beta^tu(c_t,k_{t-1})$$ Technology is given as: $$k_{t+1}=AF(K_t,L_t)+(1-\delta)K_t-c_t$$ The production function has constant returns to scale.

The household’s dynamic program is: $$V (k, z) = \max u(c, z) + \beta V (k', k) + \lambda [R k + w − c − k']$$ or alternatively $L=\beta^tU(c_t,k_{t-1})+\lambda_t[R_t k_t + w_t − c_t − k_{t+1}]$

FOC: $U_c(c,z)=\beta R'U_c(c',z')+\beta^2U_z(c'',z'')$, where $z'=k$.

My question is why is steady-state capital stock written like this? $$1=\beta[f'(k)+1-\delta]+\beta^2\frac{u_z(f(k)-\delta k,k)}{u_c(f(k)-\delta k,k)}$$

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Have you looked at the Envelope condition? $\endgroup$
    – erik
    Dec 5 '21 at 6:25
  • $\begingroup$ @erik yes, the EC are: $V_k(k,z)=\beta V_z(k',z')+\lambda R$ and $V_z(k,z)=U_z(c,z)$ $\endgroup$ Dec 5 '21 at 12:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The title concerns wealth, but does that reflect the body of your question? $\endgroup$ Dec 6 '21 at 10:34
  • $\begingroup$ I am attaching the reference for this exercise: lhendricks.org/econ720/ih1/IH1_PS-answers.pdf you can read the details here $\endgroup$ Dec 7 '21 at 10:34
2
$\begingroup$

Two points:

  1. As Richard Hardy points out in the comment, there is not really any depiction of wealth in the question.

  2. I am very curious which model this is. I can not think of any models that include lagged capital in the utility function. The form of the Euler is however very similar to a Cash-in-Advance model (which is interesting).

Following the way you have written the Bellman, but getting rid of the multiplier, since according to the problem, the constraint binds.

$V[k_t, k_{t-1}] = U[AF[k_t] +(1-\delta)k_t, k_{t-1}]+\beta V[k_{t+1}, k_t]$

FOC(with respect to $(k_{t+1})$):

$U_1[c_t, k_{t-1}]=\beta V_1[k_{t+1}, k_t]$

Envelope Condition 1 (with respect to $k_t$):

$V_1[k_t, k_{t-1}] = U_1[c_t, k_{t-1}](AF_1[k_t] + 1-\delta) + \beta V_2[k_{t+1}, k_t]$

Envelope Condition 2 (with respect to $k_{t-1}$):

$V_2[k_t, k_{t-1}] = U_2[c_t, k_{t-1}]$

Iterate Envelope conditions forward by one period and use the FOC to get (assuming finite consumption):

$U_1[c_t, k_{t-1}]/U_1[c_{t+1}, k_{t}] = \beta (AF_1[k_{t+1}] + 1-\delta) + \beta^2 U_2[c_{t+2}, k_{t+1}]/U_1[c_{t+1}, k_{t}]$

Now impose steady state (denoting at steady state $k_{t+1}=k_t=k$) and you have:

$1 = \beta (AF_1[k] + 1-\delta) + \beta^2 \frac{U_2[AF[k]-\delta k, k]}{U_1[AF[k]-\delta k, k]} $

$\endgroup$
1

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.