Economics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for those who study, teach, research and apply economics and econometrics. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
Wikipedia states:
Exogenous Preference -- one that comes from outside the model and is unexplained by the model.
Endogenous Preference -- preferences then cannot be taken as given, but are affected by individual internal responses to the external state of affairs.
Can someone clarify what these two terms mean? Specifically, what does it mean to be "inside" (or internal) or "outside" (or external) of a model?
Exogenous variables are believed to have some value given by nature. They are not caused by your theory's variables of interest. This is why they are said to be outside the model.
Endogenous variables have values dependent on your theory's variables of interest. They both cause, and are caused by your topic.
Example: In the study of wages, some individuals are born superior, genetically, perhaps. They are superior exogenously. Because of their superior innate quality, they may choose to seek additional education knowing they will get higher returns for their investments. So the amount of education is endogenous to wages, because a person's expected earnings informs their education.
The inside/internal/endogenous thing simply means that you have something inside your model that determines the value of this specific value.
To put it differently: the model structure (e.g. its underlying equation) + the exogenous variables you throw into your model determine the endogenous variable.
An Exogenous Variable is defined as a variable which is unaffected by other variables within an model.
take a multivariable regression model as an example:
$$y=\beta_0+\beta_1x_1+\beta_2x_2+u $$
$x_1$ is called an exogenous variable when its determination is unaffected by $x_2$ and error term $u$.
An Endogenous Variable is defined when $x_1$ is influneced by $x_2$ or $u$.
This is important because when we run a regression we are producing a function which assumes a dependent and independent variable. If we find endogeneity we wont get accurate estimates for the effect of $x_1$ on $y$.
Some quotes from this article:
Where do preferences originate? How are they formed? How does the economic, social, legal, and cultural environment shape the formation of preferences? In recent years concepts such as ‘habit formation,’ ‘social norms,’ ‘cultural values,’ ‘conspicuous consumption,’ and others have been formalized in various ways in the economics literature in an attempt to begin to answer these difficult questions. Yet, mainstream economic theory typically assumes that preferences are exogenous and stable. [...] economists should take them as given and analyze the implications for economic behavior (Friedman, 1962).
The endogeneity of preferences implies that not only individual preferences [...] determine economic outcomes, but also that the economic, social, legal, and cultural structure of society affects preferences.
Thus, using endogenous preferences allow a researcher to study phenomena where social interaction (e.g. networks, influence, marketing, etc) is relevant for consumption choices. For example, here is a paper studying "fashion cycles". Preferences for individual $i$ are quite simply define as Cobb-Douglas functions:
$$ U^i = x^{\alpha_i} y^{1-\alpha_i} $$
where $x$ and $y$ are two goods, and $\alpha_i \in (0,1)$. Preferences are endogenised by assuming that $\alpha_i$ depends on society's past level of consumption of good $x$. Therefore, how much other individual have consumed in the past affects how much an individual would like to consume today. In this sense, preferences are endogenous. This contrast with common exogenous preferences where individual choices do not depend on other individual choices (other than through common market mechanisms like price, demand-supply).
This article offers a brief history of exogenous preferences.
