2
$\begingroup$

Epstein-Zin (EZ) utility is the solution to:

enter image description here

DEU is relatively simple: $\sum_t \delta ^t\mathbb E[u(c_t)]$.

Is DEU a special case of EZ? How are those two models compared?

Since EZ is a solution of a complicated dynamic equation, I am having a very hard time figuring out the connection between the two models.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

Epstein-Zin (EZ) preferences are a generalisation of dynamic CRRA preferences.

In standard CRRA preferences, i.e. $$ U(c_0,\dots) = \mathbb{E} \left[ \sum_t \beta^t \frac{c_t^{1 - \rho}}{1 - \rho} \right] $$ The Arrow-Pratt relative risk aversion is $\rho$ and elasticity of intertemporal substitution is $\frac{1}{\rho}$ and thus is unable to be disentangled.

EZ solves this. Actually, the representation you have above is only for deterministic streams. EZ preferences have the recursive representation: $$ V_t = \left( (1-\beta)c_t^{1-\rho} + \beta \left[ \mathbb{E} V_{t+1}^{1-\alpha} \right]^{\frac{1-\rho}{1-\alpha}} \right)^{\frac{1}{1-\rho}} $$ Where $\alpha$ captures risk attitudes and $\rho$ the elasticity of intertemporal substitution.

In fact, they agree on deterministic streams of consumption (i.e. when there is no uncertainty). Take a (non-stochastic) stream $(c_0,c_1, \dots)$ and the expectation operator drops to $$ V_t = \left( (1-\beta)c_t^{1-\rho} + \beta V_{t+1}^{1-\rho} \right)^{\frac{1}{1-\rho}} $$ Define the monotone transform $U_t = V_t^{1-\rho}$ to get $$ U_t = (1-\beta)c_t^{1-\rho} + \beta U_{t+1} $$ in other words $$ U_0(c_0,c_1,\dots) = (1-\beta) \sum_t \beta^t c_t^{1 - \rho} $$ which are just CRRA!

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.