What's the literature on Non-Constant elasticities of substitution? Say, I'm interested in the elasticity between $c_1$ and $c_2$ increasing/decreasing in income/wealth.

CES utility functions with equal spending weights are similar to

$$ \left(\sum_i c_i^\frac{\epsilon-1}{\epsilon}\right)^\frac{\epsilon}{1-\epsilon}$$

A simple way of getting non-constant elasticities would be to let $\epsilon = \epsilon(Y)$. Then the elasticity of substitution would vary with income:

$$\frac{d \log \frac{c_i}{c_j}}{d \log \frac{p_j}{p_i}} = \epsilon(Y)$$

But I feel that this mixture of preference-parameters and outcome variables is suboptimal.

Is there a common way of modeling these preferences?

  • $\begingroup$ I don't think there is much written about this. Usually the challange is to show that there is CES. But in general CES only holds for 2 goods. With more than 2 goods there CES cannot exist between all of the goods. $\endgroup$ – Rud Faden Apr 12 '15 at 6:54
  • $\begingroup$ @RudFaden even that argument is new to me, given that preferences -- as I lied them down - appear symmetric. Would you have a reference? $\endgroup$ – FooBar Apr 12 '15 at 8:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Try this. Will the Real Elasticity of Substitution Please Stand Up? (A Comparison of the Allen/Uzawa and Morishima Elasticities) $\endgroup$ – Rud Faden Apr 12 '15 at 9:28

Eichenbaum and Fisher (2005) follow Kimball (1995) in allowing for the possibility that the elasticity of demand is increasing in a firm’s price. Which is not exactly what I was looking for, but it's a start.


There's a great Econometrica paper by Zhelobodko, Kokovin, Parenti and Thisse from 2012:

They allow the elastisity of subsititution $\frac{u^{\prime}(x_i)}{x_iu^{\prime\prime}(x_i)}$, constant in the CES case, to be a function of the average level of consumption $x$ and make the model Dixit-Stiglitz model of monopolistic competition shine with new colors.


We propose a model of monopolistic competition with additive preferences andvariable marginal costs. Using the concept of “relative love for variety,” we providea full characterization of the free-entry equilibrium. When the relative love for varietyincreases with individual consumption, the market generates pro-competitive effects.When it decreases, the market mimics anti-competitive behavior. The constant elastic-ity of substitution is the only case in which all competitive effects are washed out. Wealso show that our results hold true when the economy involves several sectors, firmsare heterogeneous, and preferences are given by the quadratic utility and the translog.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.