I am trying to extend the results of Gendron-Carrier et al. (2022) article published in the American Economic Journal : Applied Economics which is about the effect of subway opening on pollution.

I want to use an estimation method robust to heterogeneous treatment effects (meaning that the effect of subway opening on air pollution may have a different trend throughout the different cities where it is implemented).

I cannot understand if the recent robust estimator proposed by De Chaisemartin and d'Hautfoeuille (2020) which is for two-way fixed estimation can be used in my case.

The specification of Gendron-Carrier is as follows :

$AOD_{it} = \beta_i + \alpha_1D_{it} + \gamma'X_{it} + \epsilon_{it}$

Where $AOD$ is a measure of air pollution, $D_{it}$ is a dummy variable equal to 1 when the subway has opened 18 months ago, $X_{it}$ is a set of controls consisting of year-by-continent indicators to flexibly account for regional trends in AOD, and city-by-calendar month (1–12) indicators to capture seasonality in pollution patterns as well as climate controls. $\epsilon_{it}$ is the error term of the equation.

Do you think the De Chaisemartin and d'Hautfoeuille applies in this case?

Is this a two-way fixed effects estimation?

In our case how can we apply an estimation method robust to heterogeneous treatment effects?


1 Answer 1


My advice is to do a stacked diff-in-diff. For each treated unit, randomly assign a control unit. This forms a group, $g$. There will be several such groups.

$$y_{igt} = \sum_{s}\beta_sT_{ig}d_{gs}+\lambda_i +\lambda_{gt}+\varepsilon_{igt}$$

where $\beta_s$ is the effect of being $s$ periods after (or before) treatment. $T_{ig}$ is a binary variable that individual $i$ in group $g$ was treated. $d_{gs}$ is a binary variable for being $s$ time periods from treatment for group $g$, $\lambda_i$ are individual FE, $\lambda_{gt}$ are fixed effects for group and being $t$ time periods from treatment.

Gardner 2021 shows the stacked diff-in-diff returns a weighted average of the ATT for each treated unit.

I personally find this much more desirable than the De Chaisemartinand d'Hautfoeuille or Sun and Abraham estimators because it is straightforward and similar in spirit to baseline diff-in-diff.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.